LaMarr v. Lang, 5D00-3779.
Decision Date | 05 October 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 5D00-3779.,5D00-3779. |
Citation | 796 So.2d 1208 |
Parties | James David LaMARR, Appellant, v. Carole LANG, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Thomas E. Cushman, St. Augustine, for Appellant.
Tania R. Schmidt-Alpers of Central Florida Legal Services, Inc., Palatka, for Appellee.
ORFINGER, R. B., J.
James David LaMarr appeals the entry of a permanent injunction for protection against repeat violence entered at the request of Carole Lang. Because we find that the trial court's evidentiary rulings deprived LaMarr of a fair hearing, we reverse.
Lang hired LaMarr to remodel her home. After the work was completed, a dispute arose regarding the amount due LaMarr and when payment would be made. According to Lang, while they were discussing the matter, LaMarr became enraged and hit her with a box of nails. The next day, LaMarr returned to Lang's home to retrieve his tools. LaMarr and Lang again discussed their dispute and, according to Lang, LaMarr again became enraged and threw a book at her. Fearing for her safety, Lang sought an injunction for protection against repeat violence pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2000).
At the injunction hearing, over the objection of LaMarr's attorney, the trial judge permitted Lang's attorney to:
Generally, rulings on evidentiary matters are within the sound discretion of the trial court. Connell v. Guardianship of Connell, 476 So.2d 1381, 1382 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). A trial court has wide discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence, and, absent an abuse of discretion, the trial court's ruling on evidentiary matters will not be overturned. Dale v. Ford Motor Co., 409 So.2d 232, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). When reviewing erroneous rulings on evidentiary matters, we examine the entire record to determine if the error is harmless.
Each of the evidentiary rulings discussed above impermissibly allowed evidence proving only LaMarr's bad character or propensity for violence. This was improper. See § 90.404.2(a) Fla. Stat. (2000); Parks v. Zitnik, 453 So.2d 434, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Compounding the problems, the trial court also allowed Lang's attorney to question LaMarr about the nature of a prior criminal conviction. While section 90.610, Florida Statutes (2000) allows evidence regarding the conviction of certain crimes as impeachment, generally, the law does not permit questions about the nature of a witness' conviction. See Sneed v. State, 397 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So.2d 1346, 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). If the question was an attempt to offer collateral crime evidence, it was improper. ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
LEWIS v. SUN TIME Corp. d/b/a Prime Time
...852 n. 51 (Fla.2001); Fla. Inst. for Neurologic Rehab., Inc. v. Marshall, 943 So.2d 976, 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); LaMarr v. Lang 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); (2) more specifically, in the admission of testimony concerning the prior safety history of the site in question, that is......
-
Vitiello v. State
...and, absent an abuse of discretion, the trial court's ruling on evidentiary matters will not be overturned." LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Dale v. Ford Motor Co., 409 So. 2d 232, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) ). However, "that discretion is limited by the rules......
-
Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Johnson
...and, absent an abuse of discretion, the trial court's ruling on evidentiary matters will not be overturned." LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Dale v. Ford Motor Co., 409 So.2d 232, 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) ). However, "that discretion is limited by the rules o......
-
Mathis v. State
...evidentiary matters will not be overturned." Helton v. Bank of Am., N.A., 187 So.3d 245, 247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (quoting LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ). A trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence "constitutes an abuse of discretion if it is based ‘o......
-
Domestic violence
...of violence; • The existence of a verifiable order of protection issued previously or from another jurisdiction. [ LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(evidence of prior acts of domestic violence against others other than petitioner was impermissible use of bad character or p......
-
Witness
...was not admissible. The evidence served only to impeach plaintiff’s credibility and reflect poorly on her character. LaMarr v. Lang , 796 So.2d 1208, 1209-10 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Evidence that home remodeler had been arrested for violating earlier injunction not involving homeowner presentl......