Lauer v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 16 June 1997 |
| Parties | Lisa LAUER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Warner & Joselson, New York City (Jonathan D. Warner and Karl E. Scheuerman, of counsel), for appellant.
Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Julian L. Kalkstein, of counsel), for respondents.
Before PIZZUTO, J.P., and SANTUCCI, FRIEDMANN and LUCIANO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for the intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), entered April 26, 1996, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated August 8, 1996, entered on the order, which dismissed the complaint.
ORDERED that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1] ).
The plaintiff's three-year-old son was found dead on August 7, 1993. The death certificate, certified August 8, 1993, specified that the cause of death was "blunt injuries of neck and brain". However, a neuropathology report dated October 13, 1993, specified a "diagnosis" of "aneurysm due to dysplasia of branch of left posterior cerebral artery, ruptured, with secondary subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage". The neuropathology report was prepared by the defendant Eddy Lilavois, a physician employed by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York. Lilavois had also performed the autopsy and signed the initial death certificate.
A final autopsy report, prepared on or about March 9, 1995, specifies the cause of death as the "spontaneous rupture of aneurysm of left posterior cerebral artery". The autopsy report also specifies the manner of death as "Natural". An amended death certificate, specifying the cause of death as a "spontaneous rupture of aneurysm", was not prepared until April 27, 1995. The amended death certificate was signed by another physician "for Eddy Lilavois".
During the 18 months between the issuance of the initial and the amended death certificates, the plaintiff's husband was a suspect in a possible homicide of their child. Allegedly the plaintiff cooperated with the New York City Police Department in their investigation of her husband. After learning of the amended findings as to the cause of death, she commenced this action, seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Named as defendants were the City of New York and Lilavois. The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint, concluding that personal jurisdiction had not been obtained over Lilavois and that, in any event, the complaint failed to state a cause of action. We affirm.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiff's process server did not, as a matter of law, employ due diligence in attempting to personally serve Lilavois (see, Pizzolo v. Monaco, 186 A.D.2d 727, 588 N.Y.S.2d 910; see also, Walker v. Manning, 209 A.D.2d 691, 619 N.Y.S.2d 137; Serrano v. Pape, 188 A.D.2d 647, 591 N.Y.S.2d 516).
The complaint failed to state a cause of action for either intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress. It is well settled that public policy bars claims sounding in intentional infliction of emotional distress against a governmental entity (see, Wheeler v. State of New York, 104 A.D.2d 496, 498, 479 N.Y.S.2d 244; LaBelle v. County of St. Lawrence, 85 A.D.2d 759,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Yang Feng Zhao v. City of New York
...series of Appellate Division cases to say so. (Defs.' Mem. in Supp. of Summ. J. 30) (citing, inter alia, Lauer v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 543, 659 N.Y.S.2d 57, 58 (2d Dep't 1997)). Lauer cites to, and is preceded by, a string of Appellate Division decisions, none of which appear to art......
-
Dzwonczyk v. Syracuse City Police Dep't
...against a government entity." Rivera v. City of New York, 392 F.Supp.2d 644, 657 (S.D.N.Y.2005) ( quoting Lauer v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 543, 659 N.Y.S.2d 57, 58 (1997)). ...
-
Thomas v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
...923 F.Supp.2d 462, 480, No. 11–CV–766 FB RML, 2013 WL 563436, at *15 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2013) (quoting Lauer v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 543, 659 N.Y.S.2d 57, 58 (N.Y.App.Div.1997)); see also Payne v. N.Y. City Police Dep't, 863 F.Supp.2d 169, 189 (E.D.N.Y.2012) (citing Ellison v. City ......
-
Rivera v. City of New York
...bars claims sounding in intentional infliction of emotional distress against a governmental entity." Lauer v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 543, 659 N.Y.S.2d 57, 58 (2d Dep't. 1997), appeal denied, 91 N.Y.2d 807, 669 N.Y.S.2d 260, 692 N.E.2d 129 (1998). Rivera's claim of intentional inflicti......