Love v. State
Decision Date | 10 February 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 77685,77685 |
Citation | 378 S.E.2d 893,190 Ga.App. 264 |
Parties | LOVE v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Edwards & Krontz, Jennifer McLeod, Douglasville, for appellant.
Frank C. Winn, Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendant was convicted of the offenses of kidnapping with bodily injury, rape, incest and cruelty to children. A sentence was imposed as to each conviction except the rape conviction, which the trial court determined merged into the conviction for kidnapping with bodily injury. On appeal, defendant contends the evidence did not authorize his conviction of kidnapping with bodily injury and that the offenses of incest and cruelty to children merged into greater offenses. Held:
1. All of the offenses with which defendant was charged arose from a single incident involving the defendant's 15-year-old niece. Defendant accompanied the victim and her sister to a movie. Afterwards the victim and defendant went for a walk. Eventually the two sat on "a concrete block that goes across the creek ..." As the victim sat on the "concrete block" the defendant sat behind her and asked her if she was scared of him. After she answered, "no," he grabbed the back of her head and "jerked [her] down off the concrete block onto the dirt." Defendant then told the victim to take off her clothes or he would kill her. The defendant refused to let the victim up, held her on her throat, and continued telling her to take her clothes off. After the victim took her shorts off, defendant got on top of her and had vaginal intercourse with the victim. Defendant was on top of the victim for about five minutes, during which time he told the victim he would kill her if she ever told anybody. After the defendant got through he permitted the victim to put her clothes back on and leave. An officer with the Douglas County Sheriff's Department testified he investigated the crime scene where a concrete culvert was situated over the creek running underneath the road. (In her testimony, the victim had referred to the culvert as "a concrete block that goes across the creek ...")
Defendant contends his conviction of kidnapping with bodily injury was not authorized because there was no evidence of asportation. Helton v. State, 166 Ga.App. 662, 663(1), 305 S.E.2d 592. Further, we find "that there was sufficient evidence introduced by the state at trial to authorize the jury in convicting the [defendant] of kidnapping with bodily injury to the victim." Peck v. State, 239 Ga. 422, 427, 238 S.E.2d 12. See Lassiter v. State, 175 Ga.App. 338, 340(4), 333 S.E.2d 412.
2. Ramsey v. State, 145 Ga.App. 60, 64(10), 243 S.E.2d 555, reversed on other grounds, 241 Ga. 426, 246 S.E.2d 190. Accordingly, defendant's conviction and sentence on the incest charge must be vacated. McCranie v. State, 157 Ga.App. 110, 111(1), 276 S.E.2d 263. See Sparks v. State, 185 Ga.App. 225, 226(1), 363 S.E.2d 631.
3. We find no merit in defendant's contention that the conviction of cruelty to children merged in the greater crime of rape. Haynes v. State, 249 Ga. 119, 120(2), 288 S.E.2d 185.
In the case sub judice, the evidence used to establish the offense of cruelty to children was the grabbing and pulling of the victim's hair and holding her throat. The offense of rape, including the element of force, was amply proven by the subsequent events including defendant's threats before and during intercourse to kill the victim. Drake v. State, 239 Ga. 232, 235(1), 236 S.E.2d 748; McNeal v. State, 228 Ga. 633, 635(2), 187 S.E.2d 271. Thus, the jury was authorized to conclude that two separate and distinct offenses were committed. Morris v. State, 179 Ga.App. 228, 229(6), 345 S.E.2d 686; Shab v. State, 187 Ga.App. 513, 370 S.E.2d 775.
Judgment affirmed as to convictions and sentences for the offenses...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Drinkard v. Walker
...210 S.E.2d 680 (1974); Haynes v. State, 249 Ga. at 119, 288 S.E.2d 185; Alvin, 253 Ga. at 740, 325 S.E.2d 143; Love v. State, 190 Ga. App. 264, 265, 378 S.E.2d 893 (1989); McCranie, 157 Ga.App. at 110, 276 S.E.2d 263; Cofield v. State, 216 Ga.App. 623, 626, 455 S.E.2d 342 (1995); Starnes v.......
-
Bohannon v. State
...within the meaning of OCGA § 16-5-40(b). See Green v. State, 193 Ga.App. 894, 896(1), 389 S.E.2d 358 (1989); Love v. State, 190 Ga.App. 264-265(1), 378 S.E.2d 893 (1989). The evidence authorized any rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was guilty of the ch......
-
Mercer v. State
...to the floor at a single location [and attempting to rape her]."16 As stated by Judge (now Justice) Benham in his special concurrence in Love v. State:17 "[I]n those cases where the movement involved is minimal, and the alleged kidnapping occurs in furtherance of some other criminal enterpr......
-
Smith v. State
...120, 288 S.E.2d 185 (1982); McClure v. State, 179 Ga.App. 245, 246(2), 345 S.E.2d 922 (1986). 27. Love v. State, 190 Ga.App. 264, 266, 378 S.E.2d 893 (1989) (Benham, J., concurring specially). 28. (Emphasis supplied.) Perkins v. State, 224 Ga.App. 63, 64(1), 479 S.E.2d 471 (1996); Wittschen......