M.L.J. v. State

Decision Date11 May 2012
Docket NumberNo. 2D10–2310.,2D10–2310.
Citation93 So.3d 348
PartiesM.L.J., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

M.L.J. appeals the trial court's disposition order finding that he violated section 877.03, Florida Statutes (2009), which prohibits disorderly conduct. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed M.L.J. on probation. We have jurisdiction. SeeFla. R.App. P. 9.145(b)(1) (providing for appeal of an order of adjudication of delinquency or withholding adjudication of delinquency or any disposition order entered thereon). 1 We affirm the delinquency finding but reverse for the trial court to enter a proper disposition order.

The charge against M.L.J. arose from a schoolyard tussle with another boy. M.L.J. said that he acted in self-defense; the other boy was the aggressor. M.L.J. argues on appeal that fundamental error or ineffective assistance of trial counsel on the face of the record occurred where counsel failed to move for a judgment of dismissal based on self-defense. We are unpersuaded.

When charged with disorderly conduct, a defendant who does not initiate the fight and acts to protect himself or herself from the attacker may assert self-defense. S.D.G. v. State, 919 So.2d 704, 705 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). The defense applies only if the defendant did not provoke the fight. D.M.L. v. State, 773 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). However, our record reflects disputed facts as to whether M.L.J. was the aggressor. See, e.g., Rasley v. State, 878 So.2d 473, 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Dias v. State, 812 So.2d 487, 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Hoffman v. State, 708 So.2d 962, 964 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). On such disputed facts, a motion for judgment of dismissal would have failed. We observe, nonetheless, that M.L.J.'s counsel pleaded strenuously in her closing argument to the trial court that M.L.J. acted in self-defense. We see neither fundamental error nor ineffective assistance of counsel on the face of the record.

M.L.J. argues, and the State concedes, that we must reverse and remand M.L.J.'s case for entry of a separate dispositionorder for the disorderly conduct offense. SeeFla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(d); W.S.G. v. State, 32 So.3d 725, 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that entering one order of commitment in two separate cases constituted error and reiterating that each case requires a separate disposition order); G.V. v. State, 863 So.2d 1271, 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (reversing and remanding for entry of separate disposition orders). M.L.J. preserved this issue by filing a motion to correct disposition error which was deemed denied when not ruled upon within thirty days by the trial court. SeeFla. R. Juv. P. 8.135(b)(1), (2).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

1. We reject the State's argument that the appeal is moot because M.L.J. received a withhold of adjudication and his probationary period had expired. M.L.J. raised the legality of his disposition as well as his sentence. See, e.g., Sramek v. State, 946 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (noting that the fact that a defendant has already served his sentence does not render his appeal moot) ( citing Hagan v. State, 853 So.2d 595, 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)); Lamb v. State, 526 So.2d 998, 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (holding that appeal is not moot even though the defendant had completed his sentence because the “possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the appeal”). There are also financial and social consequences of M.L.J.'s...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Bell v. Battaglia
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 2022
    ...§ 784.048(1), (2) (requiring a course of "willful[ ]" conduct including "repeated[ ]," "malicious[ ]" acts); cf. M.L.J. v. State , 93 So. 3d 348, 349 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (rejecting the State's mootness argument after the appellant's probationary period had expired because "[t]here are al......
  • Bell v. Battaglia
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 12, 2022
    ... ... government's significant curtailment of the ... respondent's liberty. Cf. Casiano v. State , 310 ... So.3d 910, 915 (Fla. 2021) (discussing the distinction ... between an appeal from an illegal sentence that has already ... ...
  • C.M. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 2018
    ...defense to battery. S.J.C. v. State, 906 So.2d 1115, 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; see § 776.012, Fla. Stat. (2015) ; cf. M.L.J. v. State, 93 So.3d 348, 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ("When charged with disorderly conduct, a defendant who does not initiate the fight and acts to protect himself or hers......
  • USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Prime Care Chiropractic Centers, P.A.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 2012
    ... ... Fla. R.App. P. 9.160(f)(1); State v. Muldowny, 871 So.2d 911, 913 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). [T]he standard of review with respect to the application of a multiplier is one of abuse of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Pretrial motions and defenses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 30, 2021
    ...disorderly conduct as a result of a fight, he may claim self-defense so long as he was not the aggressor in the fight. M.L.J. v. State, 93 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) Defendant was involved in a fight in the parking lot of a bar. He testified that the crowd was closing in on him, and he h......
  • Appeals
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 30, 2021
    ...consequences of having a juvenile record as such that the appeal can proceed despite the sentence having been completed. M.L.J. v. State, 93 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) When the circuit court applies then-controlling law in the district in a way that denies relief, and the Florida Supreme......
  • Crimes
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • April 30, 2021
    ...disorderly conduct as a result of a fight, he may claim self-defense so long as he was not the aggressor in the fight. M.L.J. v. State, 93 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) To commit disorderly conduct by words alone, the evidence must show that the words caused a crowd to gather resulting in s......
  • Miscellaneous
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • April 30, 2021
    ...consequences of having a juvenile record as such that the appeal can proceed despite the sentence having been completed. M.L.J. v. State, 93 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) A child who violates a truancy order cannot be sentenced to five days in secure detention for contempt. MISCELLANEOUS 14......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT