Mahoney v. Norcross

Decision Date09 October 1933
Citation284 Mass. 153,187 N.E. 227
PartiesMAHONEY v. NORCROSS.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Third District Court of Eastern Middlesex; E. A. Counihan, Judge.

Action by Edgar Mahoney against Enid E. Norcross. Finding for plaintiff. On defendant's appeal from order dismissing report.

Order affirmed.

J. G. Schumb, of Boston, for appellant.

E. J. Flavin, of Boston, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The case at bar falls within the general principle that in an action arising from a collision between automobiles at intersecting streets the due care and contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the negligence of the defendant present questions of fact. The finding in favor of the plaintiff imports a finding of all subsidiary facts essential to that conclusion and must stand unless unsupported by the evidence. Without summarizing the testimony it is enough to say that a finding in favor of the plaintiff was warranted. Ferreira v. Zaccolanti, 281 Mass. 91, 183 N. E. 261.

The defendant presented several requests for rulings which were refused because based on assumptions of facts not in accord with the facts found by the trial judge. It is not necessary to examine such requests because they are immaterial in view of the facts found. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd., v. William Firth Co., 210 Mass. 8, 18, 95 N. E. 961;Castano v. Leone, 278 Mass. 429, 180 N. E. 312.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Goulding v. Cook
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 13 Marzo 1996
  • DiLuzio v. United Elec., Radio and Mach. Workers of America, Local 274
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 16 Febrero 1984
    ...Nat'l Bank, 366 Mass. 519, 320 N.E.2d 873 (1974); Attorney Gen. v. Woburn, 322 Mass. 634, 79 N.E.2d 187 (1948); Mahoney v. Norcross, 284 Mass. 153, 187 N.E. 227 (1933). The cases relied upon by the plaintiff, requiring findings of fact in the record to support the final determination of an ......
  • Bresnick v. Heath
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 31 Octubre 1935
    ... ... reviewable. Engel v. Checker Taxi Co., 275 Mass ... 471, 176 N.E. 179; Winchester v. Missin, 278 Mass ... 427, 428, 180 N.E. 215; Mahoney v. Norcross, 284 ... Mass. 153, 187 N.E. 227. An appeal brings before this court ... for consideration only rulings of law made by the trial judge ... ...
  • Nicoli v. Berglund
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 27 Febrero 1936
    ...conclusion. Adams v. Dick, 226 Mass. 46, 53, 115 N.E. 227;Engel v. Checker Taxi Co., 275 Mass. 471, 475, 176 N.E. 179;Mahoney v. Norcross, 284 Mass. 153, 187 N.E. 227;Wood v. Town of Oxford (Mass.) 195 N.E. 321. Whether or not there was a violation of the statute was a question of fact. Pat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT