Marean v. N. Y., S. & W. R. R.
| Decision Date | 01 April 1895 |
| Citation | 167 Pa. 220 |
| Parties | Harry Marean, Appellant, <I>v.</I> New York, Susquehanna & Western R. R. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Before STERRETT, C. J., GREEN, MITCHELL, DEAN and FELL, JJ. Affirmed.
C. Smith, H. J. Kotz with him, for appellant, cited, on the question of contributory negligence: Christman v. R. R., 141 Pa. 604; Brown v. French, 104 Pa. 604; Moore v. R. R., 4 A. & E. R. R. 569; R. R. v. Werner, 89 Pa. 66; Dublin & Waterford R. R. v. Slattery, 39 L. T. Rep. (N. S.) 265; R. R. v. Kane, 6 Atl. 845; R. R. v. Armstrong, 52 Pa. 286; Payne v. Reese, 100 Pa. 301.
Cited on the question of risk of employment: Patterson v. R. R., 76 Pa. 389; Clarke v. Holmes, 7 Hur. & Nor. 937; Priestley v. Fowler, 3 M. & W. 1; Pantzar v. Mining Co., 99 N. Y. 376; Hough v. R. R., 100 U. S. 213; Patterson v. Wallace, 1 Macq. (Sc. App.) 748; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 376; McGrew v. Stone, 53 Pa. 436; Dickson v. Reuter's Tel. Co., 17 A. L. Reg. 224; R. R. v. Stout, 17 Wall. 657; R. R. v. Duffy, 35 Ark. 602.
John B. Storm, A. M. Palmer with him, for appellee, cited, on the question of contributory negligence: Monongahela City v. Fisher, 111 Pa. 9; West Chester & Phila. R. R. v. McElwee, 67 Pa. 311; Penna. R. R. v. White, 88 Pa. 327; Phila., Wilm. & Balt. R. R. v. Stinger, 78 Pa. 219; Pittsburg & Connellsville R. R. v. McClurg, 56 Pa. 294; Penna. R. R. v. Ogier, 35 Pa. 60; Dealey v. R. R., 40 L. I. 24; Morgan v. Camden & Atl. R. R., 23 W. N. C. 189; Brown v. Allegheny Val. R. R., 151 Pa. 562.
Cited on the risk of employment: King v. Thompson, 87 Pa. 365; Nagle v. R. R., 88 Pa. 35; Goshorn v. Smith, 92 Pa 435; Jennings v. R. R., 93 Pa. 337; Koons v. Telegraph Co., 102 Pa. 164; Wood on Master and Servant, 326; 3 Wood's Ry. Law, 370; Pierce on Railroads, 358; Beach on Contributory Negligence, sec. 140; Schall v. Cole, 107 Pa. 1; Russell v. Hutchinson, 15 W. N. C. 482; Reese v. Clark, 146 Pa. 465.
PER CURIAM, April 1, 1895:
All that need be said on the questions involved in this case will be found in the clear and satisfactory opinion of the learned president of the 31st judicial district, who presided specially at the hearing of the rule for new trial in this case. Neither of said questions requires further elaboration. There was no error in directing a verdict for defendant.
Judgment affirmed on the opinion above referred to.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company v. Mangan
-
Depuy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company
... ... verdict in favor of the party who produces it. Railroad ... v. Barry, 43 L. R. A. 349, 28 C. C. A. 644, 56 U. S ... App. 37, 84 F. 944; Railroad v. Shean (Tex.), 18 ... S.W. 151; Powers v. Railroad, 98 N.Y. 274; ... Crawford v. Railroad, 127 Mich. 312; Marean v ... Railroad, 167 Pa. 220, 31 A. 562; Nattress v ... Railroad, 150 Pa. 527, 24 A. 753; Wojcieshowski v ... Sugar Ref. Co., 177 Pa. 57, 35 A. 596; Railroad v ... Rogers, 6 C. C. A. 403, 13 U. S. App. 547, 57 F. 378; ... Railroad v. Lemon, 83 Tex. 143; Railroad v ... Drake, 53 Kan. ___; ... ...
-
Ortlip v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Company
... ... 343; ... Brossman v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., 113 Pa. 490; ... Mansfield Coal & Coke Co. v. McEnery, 91 Pa. 185; ... Green & Coates St. Pass. Ry. Co., v. Bresmer, 97 Pa ... 103; Cooper, Hewitt & Co. v. Butler, 103 Pa. 412; ... Frazier v. Penna. R.R. Co., 38 Pa. 104; Marean ... v. New York, Susquehanna & Western R.R. Co., 167 Pa ... 220; Rumsey v. Del., Lack. & Western R.R. Co., 151 ... Pa. 74; Higgins v. T.J. Fanning & Co., 195 Pa. 599 ... R. T ... Cornwell, with him John J. Gheen and Gibbons Gray Cornwell, ... for appellee. -- Pepper & Register ... ...
- Siegler v. Mellinger