Martin v. Zweygardt, 41438

Decision Date11 January 1978
Docket NumberNo. 41438,41438
Citation199 Neb. 770,261 N.W.2d 379
PartiesErvin MARTIN, Appellee, v. Delmer ZWEYGARDT, Appellant.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

An order of the District Court which vacates a judgment of the county court and remands the cause to the county court for a new trial is not a final order from which an appeal may be taken to this court.

Holtorf, Hansen, Kovarik & Nuttleman, P. C., Gering, for appellant.

Wright & Simmons, Scottsbluff, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., and SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, CLINTON, BRODKEY and WHITE, JJ.

BOSLAUGH, Justice.

This was an action for damages for a breach of warranty in the sale of a farm tractor at auction. The county court held the plaintiff's evidence as to damages was inadequate and dismissed the action at the close of the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff appealed to the District Court where the judgment of the county court was vacated and the cause remanded for a new trial in the county court on all issues.

The defendant has appealed to this court. The plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground there was no final order from which an appeal could be taken.

An order which affects a substantial right in an action and in effect determines the action is a final order. § 25-1902, R.R.S.1943. When the substantial rights of the parties in the action remain undetermined and the cause is retained for further action, the order is not final. Barry v. Wolf, 148 Neb. 27, 26 N.W.2d 303. Prior to the enactment of section 25-1315.03 in 1947, an order of the District Court granting a new trial in that court was not an appealable order. Egan v. Standard Oil Co., 132 Neb. 518, 272 N.W. 327.

The order in question here vacated the judgment of the county court and remanded the cause for a new trial in the county court. The general rule is that a judgment of reversal with a remand for further proceedings is not final for the purposes of appeal. See, 4 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 59, p. 580; 4 C.J.S. Appeal & Error § 152i, p. 506.

Ribble v. Furmin, 69 Neb. 38, 94 N.W. 967, cited by the defendant, is not controlling. It involved an order of the District Court which reversed an order of the county court and directed that leave be granted to file a belated claim in an estate proceeding. The order of the District Court was held to be an appealable order on the theory that the proceeding for leave to file the belated claim was separate from the hearing on the claim...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Paxton v. Crabtree
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1990
    ...689, 414 N.E.2d 1004 (1981); Southern Saw & Mower Distribs., Inc. v. Dolmar N. Am. Corp., 317 So.2d 400 (Miss.1975); Martin v. Zweygardt, 199 Neb. 770, 261 N.W.2d 379 (1978); New York State Elec. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 260 N.Y. 32, 182 N.E. 237 (1932); Barker v. Daniels, 195 Okla. 69......
  • Brozovsky v. Norquest
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1989
    ..." When a substantial right is undetermined and the cause is retained for further action, the order is not final. Martin v. Zweygardt, 199 Neb. 770, 261 N.W.2d 379 (1978). In the absence of a final order from which an appeal may be taken, the appeal must be dismissed for lack of In Matter of......
  • Interholzinger v. Dent's Estate
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1983
    ...v. Schultz, 212 Neb. 329, 322 N.W.2d 657 (1982); Knoell Constr. Co. v. Hanson, 208 Neb. 373, 303 N.W.2d 314 (1981); Martin v. Zweygardt, 199 Neb. 770, 261 N.W.2d 379 (1978). That reliance is misplaced. Lake held only that, as a general rule, where a plaintiff is allowed to continue the pros......
  • Rohde v. Farmers Alliance Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1994
    ...though the case is remanded for further proceedings below. 8. Final Orders: Appeal and Error: Case Overruled. Martin v. Zweygardt, 199 Neb. 770, 771, 261 N.W.2d 379, 380 (1978), in which the Nebraska Supreme Court stated, "[A] judgment of reversal with a remand for further proceedings is no......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • What's So Special About Special Proceedings? Making Sense of Nebraska's Final Order Statute
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 80, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...(same); Hake v. Hake, 8 Neb. Ct. App. 376, 382, 594 N.W.2d 648, 653 (1999) (same). 330. NEB. REV. STAT. § 25-1301(1) (Reissue 1995). 331. 199 Neb. 770, 261 N.W.2d 379 (1978). 332. 244 Neb. 863, 509 N.W.2d 618 (1994). 333. See id. at 868-69, 509 N.W.2d at 623. 334. See id. at 869, 509 N.W.2d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT