Martinson v. Breit's Tower Service, Inc.
| Decision Date | 25 September 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-2574,95-2574 |
| Citation | 680 So.2d 599 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D2097 Paul M. MARTINSON, Appellant, v. BREIT'S TOWER SERVICE, INC., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Paul M. Martinson, in pro per.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.
Mr. Martinson appeals an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the referee's decision denying him benefits. We affirm.
Mr. Martinson worked at Breit's Tower Service, Inc., as a vice-president and steeplejack. He was fired and applied for unemployment compensation benefits. The appeals referee denied him benefits, finding that he frequently arrived late for work despite prior warnings and concluding that such tardiness constituted misconduct. The Commission affirmed the decision, finding that the decision was in accord with the essential requirements of law.
"[A] reviewing court must defer to an agency's interpretation of an operable statute as long as that interpretation is consistent with legislative intent and is supported by substantial, competent evidence." Public Employees Relations Comm'n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass'n, 467 So.2d 987, 989 (Fla.1985); Dominguez v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n 679 So.2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). The referee's findings of fact are supported by substantial, competent evidence. 1 The record contains testimony that Mr. Martinson was tardy, that he received warnings for his tardiness, and that his late arrivals negatively affected the business' operations. In addition, Mr. Martinson admitted that he was late for work on several occasions. An employee's unauthorized and repeated failure to arrive timely at work despite warnings may constitute misconduct justifying denial of benefits. See Sanchez v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 411 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See also Tallahassee Housing Auth. v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 483 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986); Sumlar v. Intermodal Servs., Inc., 429 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Therefore, the Commission properly affirmed the referee's decision. See Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation, 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we affirm the Commission's order.
Affirmed.
1 Mr. Martinson's alleged failure to receive timely the employees' individual statements was harmless, as the employees' statements were merely cumulative to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co.
...the same. In fact, excessive tardiness has been held to constitute misconduct under the statute. See, e.g., Martinson v. Breit's Tower Service, Inc., 680 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Sumlar v. Intermodal Services, Inc., 429 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Sanchez v. Department of Labor & Em......
-
Metropolitan Dade County v. State Dept. of Environmental Protection
...is consistent with legislative intent and is supported by substantial, competent evidence." Martinson v. Breit's Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So.2d 599, 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Nelson v. Dade County Aviation Dept., 616 So.2d 56, 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). In this case, FDEP has the authority to inter......
-
Carrillo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM'N
...must be affirmed. See Tallahassee Housing Auth. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 483 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986); Martinson v. Breit's Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). ...
-
Velazquez v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
...duties and obligations to his or her employer. Excessive tardiness falls within this definition. See Martinson v. Breit's Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So.2d 599, 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Just as in Martinson, Velazquez repeatedly failed to report time, was given a warning, and then continued to be......
-
Standards of review under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act.
...3d D.C.A. 2005) (finding agency order to be "clearly erroneous"). (28) The court was quoting Martinson v. Breit's Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So. 2d 599, 599 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. (29) Doyle v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 794 So. 2d 686, 690 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 2001). (30) Atlantis at Perdido Ass'n, Inc. v. Warn......