McGuinness v. Com.

Decision Date09 July 1996
Citation423 Mass. 1003,667 N.E.2d 818
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesBrendan McGUINNESS v. COMMONWEALTH.

Brendan McGuinness, pro se.

Robert C. Cosgrove, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth.

RESCRIPT.

Brendan McGuinness (defendant) moved to dismiss an indictment charging assault and battery on a correctional officer. The defendant argued that he had already been punished for this offense by a thirty-month confinement in a departmental disciplinary unit, and thus criminal prosecution would subject him to double jeopardy. A Superior Court judge denied the defendant's motion, and he requested relief pursuant to G.L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.). A single justice of this court denied relief, and the defendant appealed, following the procedure stated in S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995). The denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss is an interlocutory ruling in the Superior Court. Because the motion was based on a double jeopardy claim, appellate review of its denial after trial and conviction would not provide adequate relief if the defendant were to prevail on the double jeopardy issue after trial. Costarelli v. Commonwealth, 374 Mass. 677, 680, 373 N.E.2d 1183 (1978). Cf. Creighton v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1001, 666 N.E.2d 1298 (1996). The defendant may pursue his appeal according to the regular appellate process.

So ordered.

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Com. v. Latimore
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1996
  • State v. Rickman & Groseclose
    • United States
    • Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 17, 2002
  • Ulla U. v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 21, 2020
    ...light of his immediate liberty interest in resolution of this dispute" [quotation and citation omitted] ); McGuinness v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1003, 1004, 667 N.E.2d 818 (1996) (permitting appeal from denial of motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds). Given that we ordinarily do not......
  • Newmexico v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 10, 2017
    ...defendant were to prevail....’ " Flood v. Commonwealth, 465 Mass. 1015, 1016, 990 N.E.2d 73 (2013), quoting McGuinness v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1003, 1004, 667 N.E.2d 818 (1996). See also Gangi v. Commonwealth, 462 Mass. 158, 160 n.2, 967 N.E.2d 135 (2012) (right not to be tried on sexual......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT