Moore v. Ala. Judicial Inquiry Comm'n
Decision Date | 19 April 2017 |
Docket Number | 1160002 |
Citation | 234 So.3d 458 |
Parties | Roy S. MOORE, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama v. ALABAMA JUDICIAL INQUIRY COMMISSION |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Phillip L. Jauregui, Judicial Action Group, Birmingham; and Mathew D. Staver and Horatio G. Mihet of Liberty Counsel, Orlando, Florida, for appellant Roy S. Moore, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama.
R. Ashby Pate of Lightfoot, Franklin & White, L.L.C., Birmingham; and John L. Carroll and Rosa Hamlett Davis, Judicial Inquiry Commission, Montgomery, for appellee Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission.
Richard A. Lawrence, Montgomery, for amicus curiae Richard A. Lawrence, in support of the appellant.
Matthew J. Clark, Prattville, for amicus curiae Sanctity of Marriage Alabama, in support of the appellant.
Winthrop E. Johnson, Montgomery, for amicus curiae 8 Trial Judges of Alabama (Tim Riley, circuit judge; T. Lee Carter, circuit judge; John Bentley, circuit judge; Mark Hammitte, district judge; Ashley McKathan, retired circuit judge; Jerry Stokes, retired circuit judge; Frank L. McGuire III, retired district judge; and Rusty Johnston, retired circuit judge), in support of the appellant.
Steven Knapp, Opelika, for amici curiae United States Justice Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States, and Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, in support of the appellant.
1
The facts of this case are undisputed. On January 23, 2015, Judge Callie Granade, district judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, issued an order declaring unconstitutional both the Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment, Ala. Const. 1901, Art. I, § 36.03, and the Alabama Marriage Protection Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 30–1–19, as violating the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Searcy v. Strange, 81 F.Supp.3d 1285 (S.D. Ala. 2015). On January 26, 2015, Judge Granade entered an injunction prohibiting the Alabama Attorney General from enforcing any Alabama law that prohibits same-sex marriage. The injunction was stayed until February 9, 2015, to allow time for an appeal of her decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Strawser v. Strange, 44 F.Supp.3d 1206 (S.D. Ala. 2015).
On January 27, 2015, Roy S. Moore, Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court,2 sent a letter, on Supreme Court of Alabama letterhead, to then Governor Robert Bentley regarding Judge Granade's orders, expressing "legitimate concerns about the propriety of federal court jurisdiction over the Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment." In his three-page letter, Chief Justice Moore laid out his arguments as to why Judge Granade's federal-court orders were not binding upon the State of Alabama and avowed: "As Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, I will continue to recognize the Alabama Constitution and the will of the people overwhelmingly expressed in the Sanctity of Marriage Amendment." He also asked Governor Bentley "to continue to uphold and support the Alabama Constitution with respect to marriage" and advised that "I stand with you to stop judicial tyranny and any unlawful opinions issued without constitutional authority."
On February 3, 2015, Chief Justice Moore penned another letter, on Administrative Office of Courts3 letterhead, addressed to the probate judges of Alabama and entitled "Federal Intrusion into State Sovereignty." To this 4–page letter, Chief Justice Moore also attached a 27–page memorandum of law, which concluded:
On February 8, 2015, Chief Justice Moore issued an administrative order to Alabama's probate judges, which provided:
(Boldface type in original.) From February through June 2015, Chief Justice Moore also conducted several interviews with representatives of national and local media outlets.
On March 3, 2015, the Alabama Supreme Court released a decision in Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Alabama Policy Institute, 200 So.3d 495 (Ala. 2015) (" API I"), a per curiam opinion ordering the probate judges named as respondents to discontinue issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in compliance with Alabama law. Chief Justice Moore's name did not appear in the vote line of this opinion, nor did he author or join any of the special writings. On March 10, 2015, the API I Court issued an order stating that API I"serves as binding statewide precedent," joining Judge Don Davis as a respondent, and enjoining Judge Davis "from issuing any further marriage licenses contrary to Alabama law." Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Alabama Policy Institute, 200 So.3d at 557, 558. Chief Justice Moore's name did not appear in the vote line of the order. On March 12, 2015, the Court issued another order declaring that all previously non-named probate judges within the State were to be respondents and were to be bound by its March 3, 2015, opinion in API I. Chief Justice Moore's name did not appear in the vote line of that order.
Strawser v. Strange, 307 F.R.D. 604, 614–15 (S.D. Ala. 2015). That same day, Judge Granade also issued an order declaring the Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment and the Alabama Marriage Protection Act unconstitutional as violating the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and enjoining the enforcement of any Alabama laws, including any injunction issued by the Alabama Supreme Court, that would prevent the issuance of a same-sex marriage license or the recognition of a same-sex marriage license. By that same order, Judge Granade stayed her injunction until such time as the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in a then pending appeal that raised many of the same issues— Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015). Strawser v. Strange, 105 F.Supp.3d 1323 (S.D. Ala. 2015).
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Obergefell, holding that "same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry in all States" and that "there is no lawful basis for a State to refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage performed in another State on the ground of its same-sex character." 576 U.S. at ––––, 135 S.Ct. at 2607–08.
On June 29, 2015, the Alabama Supreme Court invited the parties to Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Alabama Policy Institute ("API") to submit any motions or briefs addressing the effect of the Obergefell decision on the existing orders in API.
On July 1, 2015, Judge Granade issued an order clarifying that her May 21 order enjoining the enforcement of any Alabama laws, including any injunction issued by the Alabama Supreme Court, that would prevent the issuance of a same-sex marriage license or the recognition of a same-sex marriage license was in effect and binding on all Alabama probate judges. Strawser v. Strange, No. 14–0424–CG–C, 2015 WL 6121805 (S.D. Ala. July 1, 2015). On July 7, 2015, the Alabama probate judges filed in the federal district court an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Comm'n of State
...addressing the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the court's injunction. See Moore v. Ala. Judicial Inquiry Comm'n , 234 So.3d 458, 465–66, 2017 WL 1403696, at *3 (Ala. Apr. 19, 2017) (outlining complex procedural history of API ). Nine months later, on March 4, 2016, the Alaba......
-
Mills v. City of Opelika
...repetition of the situation." ’" Underwood v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ., 39 So. 3d 120, 127 (Ala. 2009)." Moore v. Alabama Judicial Inquiry Comm'n, 234 So. 3d 458, 485 (Ala. 2017).A detailed discussion of the issue presented is not required in this case, because this Court today, in Woodge......
-
Woodgett v. City of Midfield
...questions of great public interest and questions that are likely of repetition of the situation." ’ " Moore v. Alabama Judicial Inquiry Comm'n, 234 So. 3d 458, 485 (Ala. 2017) (quoting Underwood, 39 So. 3d at 127, quoting in turn Arrington v. State ex rel. Parsons, 422 So. 2d 759, 760 (Ala.......
-
Ex parte State of Alabama
...list of permissible purposes for which prior-bad-acts evidence is admissible is not exhaustive. Moore v. Alabama Jud. Inquiry Comm'n, 234 So.3d 458, 484 n.12 (Ala. 2017); Bradley v. State, 577 So.2d 541, 547 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). [2]The parties in this case do not provide much discussion reg......