Morman v. Ossining Union Free School District

Decision Date30 September 2002
Citation297 A.D.2d 788,747 N.Y.S.2d 586
PartiesDELARENTA MORMAN et al., Respondents,<BR>v.<BR>OSSINING UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ritter, J.P., Krausman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Ordered that order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The injured plaintiff, an eighth grader, was involved in an altercation with a fellow female student during an art class. The injured plaintiff claimed that the fellow student instigated the fight and that her actions were undertaken in self-defense. The plaintiffs subsequently commenced this action claiming that the defendants' alleged negligent supervision was the proximate cause of the injured plaintiff's injuries. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and the Supreme Court denied the motion. We reverse.

Schools have a duty to provide supervision to ensure the safety of those students in their charge and are liable for foreseeable injuries proximately caused by the absence of adequate supervision (see Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44; Hernandez v Christopher Robin Academy, 276 AD2d 592; Brown v Board of Educ. of Glen Cove Pub. Schools, 267 AD2d 267). "In determining whether the duty to provide adequate supervision has been breached in the context of injuries caused by the acts of fellow students, it must be established that school authorities had sufficiently specific knowledge or notice of the dangerous conduct which caused injury; that is, that the third-party acts could reasonably have been anticipated" (Mirand v City of New York, supra at 49; see Velez v Freeport Union Free School Dist., 292 AD2d 595; O'Neal v Archdioceses of N.Y., 286 AD2d 757; Hernandez v Christopher Robin Academy, supra). Injuries caused by the impulsive, unanticipated act of a fellow student ordinarily will not give rise to a finding of negligence absent proof of prior conduct that would have put a reasonable person on notice to protect against the injury-causing act (see Mirand v City of New York, supra; Velez v Freeport Union Free School Dist., supra; Janukajtis v Fallon, 284 AD2d 428).

The defendants sustained their burden of establishing that they had no actual or constructive notice of any prior similar conduct by the student who allegedly attacked the injured plaintiff. While the student had an extensive disciplinary record, the majority of the incidents involved insubordinate and disruptive behavior of a nonviolent nature. The only previous disciplinary action taken against the student for fighting occurred over eight months prior to the altercation with the injured plaintiff. These prior incidents were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Francis v. Mount Vernon Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • August 29, 2018
    ...F. v. Plainview–Old Bethpage Cent. School Dist., 94 A.D.3d 804, 805–806, 944 N.Y.S.2d 152 ; Morman v. Ossining Union Free School Dist., 297 A.D.2d 788, 789, 747 N.Y.S.2d 586 ; Janukajtis v. Fallon, 284 A.D.2d 428, 430, 726 N.Y.S.2d 451 ). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triab......
  • Carabello v.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 6, 2013
    ...insufficient to establish school district's notice of sexual assault upon female student); Morman v. Ossining Union Free Sch. Dist., 297 A.D.2d 788, 789, 747 N.Y.S.2d 586 (N.Y.App. Div.2d Dep't 2002) (finding that extensive insubordinate, disruptive, non-violent behavior, plus one incident ......
  • Jaworoski v. Sayville Union Free Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • September 27, 2013
    ...act (cf. Siller v Mahopac Cent. School Dist., 18 A.D.3d 532, 795 N.Y.S.2d 605 [2d Dept. 2005]; Mormon v Ossining Union Free School Dist., 297 A.D.2d 788, 747 N.Y.S.2d 586 [2d Dept. 2002]). While the defendant asserts that it was never informed that the day before the assault Ms. Redlow had ......
  • Sacino v. Warwick Valley Cent. Sch. Dist.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • April 6, 2016
    ...F. v. Plainview–Old Bethpage Cent. School Dist., 94 A.D.3d 804, 805–806, 944 N.Y.S.2d 152 ; Morman v. Ossining Union Free School Dist., 297 A.D.2d 788, 789, 747 N.Y.S.2d 586 ). In any event, the School District established, prima facie, that the incident occurred in so short a period of tim......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT