Motyka v. State, AW-461
| Decision Date | 12 October 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. AW-461,AW-461 |
| Citation | 457 So.2d 1114 |
| Parties | Robert William MOTYKA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Charleve V. Edwards, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Henri C. Cawthon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Motyka appeals from a sentence of 3 1/2 years in prison following conviction for leaving the scene of an accident involving death or personal injuries. Section 316.027, Florida Statutes (1983). The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in scoring victim injury in determining the recommended range pursuant to the sentencing guidelines. The trial court erred. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
Moytka was involved in an automobile accident on 23 June 1983 in which two people were killed and four people injured. He was charged with leaving the scene of an accident involving death or personal injuries. He pleaded guilty and affirmatively elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. The difficulty arose in preparing Motyka's score sheet.
The State contended 48 points should be assessed for victim injury, 24 points for each fatality. Assessing points for injury to the four passengers who were not killed was not urged because the information only alleged the injury or death of the two people who were killed. Defense counsel argued victim injury should not be scored. The trial court agreed with the State and assessed 48 points for victim injury.
With the added 48 points, Motyka's total score was 152, placing him in the recommended range of 3 1/2-4 1/2 years incarceration. Had the 48 points not been added the recommended sentence would have been any nonstate prison sanction. The trial court stated it saw no reason to deviate from the guidelines and sentenced Motyka to 3 1/2 years in prison.
As amended on 8 May 1984, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(7) provides: "Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offenses at conviction." 1 Section 316.027 prohibits leaving the scene of an accident involving death or personal injuries. Victim injury is not an element of the offense in the sense that one must injure or kill someone to be guilty of the offense.
The last sentence of the committee note to Rule 3.701(d)(7) provides: "Victim injury is to be scored for each victim for whom the defendant is convicted of injuring and is limited to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smelley v. State, BH-376
...346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), rev. denied, 484 So.2d 9 (Fla.1986); Whitfield v. State, 471 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Motyka v. State, 457 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The state argues strenuously that this court should apply the rationale of Moore v. State, 469 So.2d 947 (Fla. 5th DCA 19......
-
Sims v. State, No. 5D02-2401
...822 So.2d 1275 (Fla.2002); Triplett v. State, 709 So.2d 107 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Mr Sims also relies on two cases, Motyka v. State, 457 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), and Benedict v. State, 475 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), for the proposition that Rule 3.701(d)(7) only permits victim in......
-
Holloman v. State, 85-259
...DCA 1985); Parker v. State, 478 So.2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Whitfield v. State, 471 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Motyka v. State, 457 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Toney v. State, 456 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Hendry v. State, 460 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA The elements of every attem......
-
Benedict v. State, 84-1814
...in an accident resulting in injury or death to stop and render aid and to furnish certain information upon request. In Motyka v. State, 457 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), a case virtually identical to the present case, the court concluded that victim injury is not an element of leaving the......