Myrick v. Board of Pierce County Com'rs, 48297-7
| Decision Date | 21 September 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 48297-7,48297-7 |
| Citation | 687 P.2d 1152,102 Wn.2d 698 |
| Parties | Ok Yop MYRICK, et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF PIERCE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
CHANGING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the opinion of the court in the above cause as the same appears at 101 Wash.2d 140, 677 P.2d 140, be changed as follows:
The following material is inserted at the end of the Appendix, on page 153, 677 P.2d on page 148; and becomes a part of said Appendix:
50.16.140 Establishment license--Issuance--Grounds for denial. The auditor shall issue an establishment license to the applicant if all the application requirements of Section 50.16.120 are met, and the statements contained in the application are determined to be true, unless the auditor finds one of the following, in which case the license application shall be denied:
* * *
(C) The applicant, if an individual; or, if a corporation, any of the officers, or directors; or in the case of stockholders, those holding more than ten percent of the stock of such corporation; or, if a partnership, any of the partners, whether general or limited, or the manager or other person principally in charge of the operation of the business, has been convicted of or forfeited bail for any of the following offenses, whether it is a violation of federal, state or local law, or convicted of or forfeited bail for an offense that is reasonably related to his fitness or ability to operate as a massagist. Including, but not limited to any of the following offenses:
(1) An offense involving the use of force or violence upon the person of another that amounts to either a felony or misdemeanor;
(2) An offense involving sexual misconduct, i.e., rape, assignation, prostitution, indecent liberties, lewdness;
(3) An offense involving narcotics, dangerous drugs or dangerous weapons that amounts to a felony;
(4) A crime involving moral turpitude;
(5) A crime of attempting to defraud. The auditor may issue a license to any person convicted of any of the crimes described in subsection (C) of this section if the auditor finds that such conviction or bail forfeiture occurred at least five years prior to the date of the original application and the applicant has had no subsequent felony convictions of any nature nor any subsequent misdemeanor
convictions or bail forfeitures for crimes mentioned in this section.
50.16.160 Establishment license--Grounds for suspension or revocation.
(A) The following shall be grounds for suspension or revocation of an establishment license issued under the provisions of this chapter:
* * *
(3) The conviction or bail forfeiture of a licensee for violating a federal, state or local law, subsequent to the date of issuance of the establishment license, relating to:
(a) An offense involving the use of force or violence upon the person of another that amounts to a felony or misdemeanor, or
(b) An offense involving sexual misconduct, or
(c) An offense involving possession, use or sale of narcotics, dangerous drugs or alcoholic beverages, or
(d) An offense involving dangerous weapons which amounts to a felony, or
(e) An offense involving moral turpitude or the conviction or bail forfeiture of any of the licensee's servants, massagists, agents or employees of an offense involving moral turpitude committed...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1
...Burien Bark Supply v. King County, 106 Wash.2d 868, 871, 725 P.2d 994 (1986) (citing Myrick v. Bd. of Pierce County Commrs, 102 Wash.2d 698, 677 P.2d 140, 102 Wash.2d 698, 687 P.2d 1152 (1984)). Medina has the burden of proving that RCW 4.96.020(4) is impermissibly vague. City of Seattle v.......
-
Wash. Pub. Emps. Ass'n v. Wash. State Ctr. for Childhood Deafness & Hearing
Loss
...employee names and associated birth dates.¶42 In its simplest form, privacy is the right to be let alone. Myrick v. Bd. of Pierce County Comm'rs, 102 Wash.2d 698, 703, 677 P.2d 140, 687 P.2d 1152 (1984) (citing Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 97 S. Ct. 869, 51 L. Ed. 2d 64 (1977) ). Samuel War......
-
State v. Worrell
...persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application." Myrick v. Board of Pierce Cy. Comm'rs, 102 Wash.2d 698, 707, 677 P.2d 140, 687 P.2d 1152 (1984). 2 The test for vagueness rests on two important considerations: adequate notice to citizen......
-
American Network, Inc. v. Washington Utilities and Transp. Com'n
...equal protection test for a purely economic regulation is the "minimum scrutiny" or "rational basis" test. Myrick v. Board of Pierce Cy. Comm'rs, 102 Wash.2d 698, 701, 677 P.2d 140, 687 P.2d 1152 (1984), citing Equitable Shipyards, Inc. v. State, 93 Wash.2d 465, 611 P.2d 396 (1980). Under t......
-
Flawed Justice: Limitation of Parental Remedies for the Loss of Consortium of Adult Children
...CONST. amend. XIV, § 1. 184. See, e.g., Myrick v. Bd. of Pierce County Comm'rs, 102 Wash.2d 698, 701, 677 P.2d 140 (1984) modified by 687 P.2d 1152 185. See Parham v. Hughes, 441 U.S. 347, 351-52 (1979). 186. McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 425-26 (1961). 187. See supra Section II, parts......