National Consultants, Inc. v. Burt, 45599

Citation258 Ga. 645,374 S.E.2d 532
Decision Date21 October 1988
Docket NumberNo. 45599,45599
PartiesNATIONAL CONSULTANTS, INC. v. BURT et al.
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

Thomas J. Browning, Jerry A. Landers, Jr., Barnes, Browning, Tanksley & Casurella, Marietta, Robert D. Feagin, Atlanta, for National Consultants, Inc.

George W. Carreker, Marietta, Nedom A. Haley, Gambrell, Clarke, Anderson & Stolz, Atlanta, for Geraldine N. Burt, et al.

PER CURIAM.

After plenary consideration of this case, National Consultants, Inc. v. Burt, 186 Ga.App. 27, 366 S.E.2d 344 (1988), it is found not to satisfy the criteria for the grant of certiorari, and the writ is therefore vacated.

All the Justices concur, except MARSHALL, C.J., who dissents.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Quinones v. Maier & Berkele, Inc., A89A0574
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 Julio 1989
    ..." Tony v. Pollard, 248 Ga. 86(1), 281 S.E.2d 557; National Consultants v. Burt, 186 Ga.App. 27, 33, 366 S.E.2d 344, writ vacated, 258 Ga. 645, 374 S.E.2d 532. The dissent has, in part, relied upon certain hearsay testimony, regarding what one of the appellants testified his supervisor had a......
  • Department of Transp. v. Hillside Motors, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 31 Julio 1989
    ...range' " of the relevant evidence before it. See National Consultants v. Burt, 186 Ga.App. 27(4), 366 S.E.2d 344, writ vacated, 258 Ga. 645, 374 S.E.2d 532. Appellant's other enumerations of error are without Judgment affirmed. DEEN, McMURRAY and BANKE, P.JJ., and POPE, BENHAM and BEASLEY, ......
  • West v. Nodvin
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 10 Septiembre 1990
    ...reversed regardless of the reason given therefor. National Consultants v. Burt, 186 Ga.App. 27, 33, 366 S.E.2d 344, writ vacated, 258 Ga. 645, 374 S.E.2d 532. b. During the hearing on the motion to quash, appellee made an oral motion seeking "an order in limine against [appellant's] introdu......
  • Walter v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 Julio 1989
    ...in contemplation of the contract. OCGA § 13-6-8; National Consultants v. Burt, 186 Ga.App. 27, 36, 366 S.E.2d 344, writ vacated, 258 Ga. 645, 374 S.E.2d 532; EGL, Damages § 14. OCGA § 13-6-2 (Code Ann. § 20-1407) "provides for damages not only 'such as arise naturally and according to the u......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT