Northwestern Bonding Co., Inc., In re

Decision Date05 December 1972
Citation282 N.C. 426,192 S.E.2d 837
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesIn re NORTHWESTERN BONDING CO., INC., et al.

Uzzell & DuMont, for Grover Cleveland Mooneyham.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., Millard R. Rich, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Petition for writ of certiorari, N.C.App., 192 S.E.2d 33, by Grover Cleveland Mooneyham and appeal by Grover Cleveland Mooneyham. Petition denied and appeal dismissed for lack of a substantial constitutional question.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Boyce v. N.C. State Bar
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 2018
    ...Burton , 257 N.C. 534, 126 S.E.2d 581 (1962) ; In re Northwestern Bonding Co., 16 N.C. App. 272, 192 S.E.2d 33, cert. denied, 282 N.C. 426, 192 S.E.2d 837 (1972). Furthermore, Plaintiff did not ask the court to make a declaratory ruling on the question of Cooper's misconduct in his request ......
  • Palmer, Matter of
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1979
    ...Burton, 257 N.C. 534, 126 S.E.2d 581 (1962); In Re Northwestern Bonding Co., 16 N.C.App. 272, 192 S.E.2d 33, Appeal dismissed, 282 N.C. 426, 192 S.E.2d 837 (1972). It appears that appellate review of statutory disciplinary proceedings is now G.S. 84-28.1 (Ch. 582 1975 S.L.) provides for a d......
  • North Carolina State Bar v. DuMont
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 19, 1981
    ...criminal. In re Burton, 257 N.C. 534, 126 S.E.2d 581 (1962); In re Bonding Co., 16 N.C.App. 272, 192 S.E.2d 33, cert. denied, 282 N.C. 426, 192 S.E.2d 837 (1972). The doctrine of ex post facto laws does not apply to attorney disciplinary proceedings. In re Brown, 157 W.Va. 1, 197 S.E.2d 814......
  • State v. Malone
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 3, 1984
    ...740, 254 S.E.2d 181 (1979); In re Bonding Co., 16 N.C.App. 272, 275, 192 S.E.2d 33, 35, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 282 N.C. 426, 192 S.E.2d 837 (1972). Here, the court found that "through the testimony of [defendant's attorney] some matter has been established by the State that is p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT