Ogden v. Berry
Decision Date | 11 April 1990 |
Citation | 572 A.2d 1082 |
Parties | Mary OGDEN v. James W. BERRY. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
James F. Freeley, Jr. (orally), Boston, Mass., John E. Harrington, Jr., Winterport, for plaintiff.
George Z. Singal and Daniel A. Pileggi (orally), Gross, Minsky, Mogul & Singal, P.A., Bangor, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, HORNBY and COLLINS, JJ.
Mary Ogden, as personal representative of the Estate of Linwood Ogden, appeals a summary judgment entered in Superior Court (Piscataquis County, MacInnes, A.R.J.) in favor of James Berry, M.D., in a wrongful death action based on medical malpractice. After the chairman of the prelitigation screening panel, by agreement and pursuant to 24 M.R.S.A. § 2853(5) (Pamph.1989), granted Berry's motion to litigate the statute of limitation issue before submitting the case to the panel, the court ruled that Ogden's action is barred by the medical malpractice statute of limitation. We affirm.
Linwood Ogden consulted James Berry for medical services from 1981 to early 1983. Ogden died on August 2, 1986. On July 29, 1988, the personal representative filed a notice of her claim of professional negligence against Berry. The two-year medical malpractice period of limitation then in effect had expired prior to Ogden's death. On January 20, 1989, the personal representative filed this complaint for Ogden's wrongful death, as well as his pain and suffering and medical expenses. The two-year period of limitation contained in Maine's Wrongful Death Statute, 18-A M.R.S.A. § 2-804(b) (Supp.1989), had not expired when the complaint was filed due to the tolling provisions in 24 M.R.S.A. §§ 2903(2) and 2859 (Pamph.1989).
Mary Ogden's cause of action was created by the wrongful death statute and it accrued, if at all, when Linwood Ogden died. See Hammond v. Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville Street Railway, 106 Me. 209, 214, 76 A. 672 (1909). The issue before us is whether the expiration of the two-year medical malpractice limitation period in section 753 before Ogden died prevents the accrual, at his death, of the personal representative's wrongful death claim. For two reasons, we hold that it does.
First, although the medical malpractice statute of limitation is not directly applicable to the wrongful death action, enactments in the area of medical malpractice before this action was begun indicate that the Legislature wanted to protect the medical...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
...months before death, of lung cancer and its causation); Mason v. Gerin Corp., 231 Kan. 718, 647 P.2d 1340, 1344-45 (1982); Ogden v. Berry, 572 A.2d 1082 (Me.1990); Mills v. International Harvester Co., 554 F.Supp. 611, 613 (D.Md.1982); Larson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 427 Mich. 301, 39......
-
Sanzi v. Shetty
... ... decedent's death, the applicable statute of limitations ... had run against the decedent's action); O gden v ... Berry , 572 A.2d 1082 (Me 1990) (interpreting ... Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. 18-A § 2-804 and finding that the ... decedent's inaction in allowing the ... ...
-
Butler v. Killoran, X-R
...time of her death, which is a necessary precondition to a personal representative's subsequent wrongful death action. See Ogden v. Berry, 572 A.2d 1082, 1083 (Me.1990) (where decedent's cause of action for professional negligence had expired before his death, personal representative had no ......
-
Fabiano v. Philip Morris U.S. Inc.
... ... 2002); ... Wyness v. Armstrong World Indus ., 131 Ill.2d 403, ... 408 (1989); Ogden v. Berry , 572 A.2d 1082, 1083-1084 ... (Me. 1990); Dunn v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co ., 332 ... N.C. 129, 132-134 (1992); Deggs v ... ...