Oseni v. Hambrick
Decision Date | 25 January 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A92A2442,A92A2442 |
Citation | 427 S.E.2d 559,207 Ga.App. 166 |
Parties | OSENI et al. v. HAMBRICK et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Daryl Von Yokely, Atlanta, for appellants.
Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Clyde E. Rickard III, Atlanta, for appellees.
Hakeem Oseni and Darrie Oseni (plaintiffs) sued Jeanette Hambrick and John Thomas Hambrick (defendants) in the State Court of DeKalb County for damages which allegedly arose from an automobile collision. Daryl Von Yokely signed the complaint as "Attorney for Plaintiff" and Richard A. Coleman submitted an entry of appearance on plaintiffs' behalf. Plaintiffs later filed a pretrial order listing attorney Von Yokely and attorney Coleman "as counsel who would conduct the trial for Plaintiffs."
On August 14 and 15, 1991, attorney Coleman appeared for trial and, after a jury was empaneled and sworn, plaintiffs dismissed their complaint without prejudice. On August 21, 1991, the trial court entered an order, directing plaintiffs to pay all court costs plus a jury empaneling fee in the amount of $445 and warning that "[f]ailure to abide by the Court's order shall result in a DISMISSAL of any later attempt by Plaintiff to refile this action." On or about August 21, 1991, the trial judge's calendar clerk mailed a copy of this order to attorney Richard A. Coleman.
On February 28, 1992, attorney Von Yokely filed a renewal action on plaintiffs' behalf pursuant to OCGA § 9-2-61(a). However, plaintiffs did not pay the $445 juror fee until May 21, 1992. Defendant Jeanette Hambrick thereafter filed a motion to dismiss based upon plaintiffs' failure to pay the juror fee before filing the renewal action. In response, plaintiffs filed the affidavit of Stephanie Barrett, "the Office Administration Secretary for Daryl Von Yokely, Esquire." Ms. Barrett deposed, in pertinent part, as follows
The trial court granted defendant Jeanette Hambrick's motion to dismiss. This appeal followed. Held:
Kroger Co. v. Michaels, 183 Ga.App. 626, 627, 359 S.E.2d 698.
In the case sub judice, plaintiffs argue that attorney Von Yokely's inquiry with the Clerk of the State Court of DeKalb County regarding fees necessary for filing the renewal action sufficiently excused the failure to pay the $445 juror fee before the filing of the renewal action. This argument ignores unrefuted evidence that the trial judge's calendar clerk...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
William Goldberg & Co., Inc. v. Cohen
...come to the attorney in and about the subject matter of his employment." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Oseni v. Hambrick, 207 Ga.App. 166, 167, 427 S.E.2d 559 (1993). Moreover, it appears that Goldberg's attorney sent him a copy of the financing statement. Given this evidence, it can......
-
Prison Health Services, Inc. v. Mitchell, A02A0803.
...confined to those costs actually due and owing the court, such as filing fees or jury impaneling fees. See, e.g., Oseni v. Hambrick, 207 Ga.App. 166, 427 S.E.2d 559 (1993). And because the record demonstrates that there were no outstanding court costs in this case, we find that the trial co......
-
Grebel v. Prince
...and failing to follow the well settled policy that notice to an attorney is notice to the client employing him. Oseni v. Hambrick, 207 Ga.App. 166, 167, 427 S.E.2d 559. Accordingly, we reverse the Lee County Superior Court's order denying Grebel's action for contempt and remand the case sub......
-
Butler v. Bolton Road Partners, A96A1138
...yet made no effort to pay the full amount as required by the statute. This fact situation is more analogous to Oseni v. Hambrick, 207 Ga.App. 166, 427 S.E.2d 559 (1993), and Michaels v. Kroger Co., 193 Ga.App. 40, 41, 387 S.E.2d 2 (1989). In these cases, the Court affirmed the dismissal of ......