Palermo v. Palermo
Decision Date | 09 November 2012 |
Parties | Christine L. PALERMO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Joseph A. PALERMO, Defendant–Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Richard A. Dollinger, A.J.), entered November 15, 2011. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint.
Maureen A. Pineau, Rochester, for Defendant–Appellant.
Hurwitz Law, P.C., Rochester (Jayme Hurwitz of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alice M. v. Terrance T.
...least six months (see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], [Sup Ct, Monroe County 2011] ; affd. 100 A.D.3d 1453 [4 Dept.,2012] ; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844 [3 Dept., 2012] ; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2......
-
Trbovich v. Trbovich
...six months (see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], 2011 WL 7711557, *15, affd. for reasons stated 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533 ; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844 ; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2d 496 ). ......
-
Trbovich v. Trbovich
...six months ( see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], 2011 WL 7711557, *15, affd. for reasons stated 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2d 496). To......
-
Lyons v. Lyons
...such intimate details unnecessary as there will be no trial on any issues related to fault. DRL § 170(7) ; Palermo v. Palermo, 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533 (4th Dept.2012). In short, the husband's claim that his financial information is "confidential," is somewhat muted because his wif......