Palermo v. Palermo

Decision Date09 November 2012
PartiesChristine L. PALERMO, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Joseph A. PALERMO, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Richard A. Dollinger, A.J.), entered November 15, 2011. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint.

Maureen A. Pineau, Rochester, for DefendantAppellant.

Hurwitz Law, P.C., Rochester (Jayme Hurwitz of Counsel), for PlaintiffRespondent.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Alice M. v. Terrance T.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 23, 2015
    ...least six months (see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], [Sup Ct, Monroe County 2011] ; affd. 100 A.D.3d 1453 [4 Dept.,2012] ; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844 [3 Dept., 2012] ; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2......
  • Trbovich v. Trbovich
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2014
    ...six months (see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], 2011 WL 7711557, *15, affd. for reasons stated 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533 ; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844 ; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2d 496 ). ......
  • Trbovich v. Trbovich
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2014
    ...six months ( see Palermo v. Palermo, 35 Misc.3d 1211[A], 2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 52506[U], 2011 WL 7711557, *15, affd. for reasons stated 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533; see e.g. Rinzler v. Rinzler, 97 A.D.3d 215, 218, 947 N.Y.S.2d 844; A.C. v. D.R., 32 Misc.3d 293, 306, 927 N.Y.S.2d 496). To......
  • Lyons v. Lyons
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 11, 2015
    ...such intimate details unnecessary as there will be no trial on any issues related to fault. DRL § 170(7) ; Palermo v. Palermo, 100 A.D.3d 1453, 953 N.Y.S.2d 533 (4th Dept.2012). In short, the husband's claim that his financial information is "confidential," is somewhat muted because his wif......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT