Parkerson v. Nanton
Decision Date | 10 June 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 1D03-0991.,1D03-0991. |
Citation | 876 So.2d 1228 |
Parties | Shawna PARKERSON, Appellant, v. Padget NANTON and Trailer Bridge, Inc., a foreign corporation licensed to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James H. Daniel and Howard C. Coker, Jacksonville, and Howard S. Grossman of Grossman & Goldman, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellant.
Robert E. Biasotti of Carlton Fields, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellees.
Shawna Parkerson, the plaintiff below in this personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident in which she was injured and her father was fatally injured, appeals an order in the favor of Padget Nanton and Trailer Bridge, Inc., appellees, which denied appellant's renewed motion for directed verdict and her motions for entry notwithstanding the verdict, for additur, and for new trial. We affirm all issues raised on appeal.
We find that there was competent substantial evidence upon which the jury could have concluded that appellant's post-traumatic stress disorder was not permanent. Thus, we find no error in denying the appellant's motions. See Howell v. Winkle, 866 So.2d 192, 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(viewing evidence in light most favorable to nonmoving party, if there is any evidence upon which a jury could lawfully find for nonmoving party, a verdict should not be directed); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Manasse, 707 So.2d 1110 (Fla.1998)(jury could find that an award of economic damages for palliative care was reasonable, while at the same time finding that an award for future pain and suffering either was not proven by greater weight of evidence or was otherwise not compensable); Republic Servs. of Florida v. Poucher, 851 So.2d 866, 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)(additur not appropriate where the jury could have reached its verdict in a manner consistent with the evidence adduced).
Appellant also asserts that a directed verdict was required because certain statements of appellees' counsel made in opening and closing argument constituted a judicial admission as to the permanency of appellant's post-traumatic stress disorder. Although we recognize that this theory has been adopted in other jurisdictions, see, e.g., Childs v. Franco, 563 F.Supp. 290, 292 (E.D.Pa.1983); Larson v. A.T.S.I., 859 P.2d 273, 275 (Col.App.1993); Lowe v. Kang, 167 Ill.App.3d 772, 118 Ill.Dec. 552, 521 N.E.2d 1245, 1247-48 (1988); Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 748 A.2d 961, 967 (Me.2000); Kohne v. Yost, 250 Mont. 109, 818 P.2d 360, 362 (1991); and Francis v. Pountney, 972 P.2d 143, 147 (Wyo.1999); but see Kuzmic v. Kreutzmann, 100 Wis.2d 48, 301 N.W.2d 266 (Ct.App.1980), we decline to adopt it under the circumstances here. Further, under Florida law, absent a stipulation, statements of counsel not made under oath are not evidence. See Murphy v. State, 667 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. Thompson, 852 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); and Sloan v. Sloan, 393 So.2d 642, 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see also section 1.1. Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases ("The statements that the attorneys now make and the arguments that they later make are not...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
D.R. Horton v. Bischof & Coffman
...statements made by counsel during an opening or closing statement may not result in a judicial admission. See Parkerson v. Nanton, 876 So.2d 1228, 1230 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (declining to adopt rule that statements of counsel made during opening and closing arguments may constitute a judic......
-
Schroeder v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.
...However, "under Florida law, absent a stipulation, statements of counsel not made under oath are not evidence." Parkerson v. Nanton , 876 So. 2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We decline to interpret the lender's statements as a stipulation of fact that required taxes were not paid on the ......
-
Donohue v. State
...to cross-examination, are not evidence." Sloan v. Sloan, 393 So.2d 642, 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see also Parkerson v. Nanton, 876 So.2d 1228, 1229-30 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (affirming denial of motion for directed verdict and noting that statements by defendants' counsel in opening and closin......
-
Shaw v. Jain
...between the drug and alcohol use of the plaintiff mother and the injuries sustained by her baby). Jain relies on Parkerson v. Nanton, 876 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), a prior decision of this court which he maintains reaches a contrary result on similar facts. However, the opinion in tha......
-
Motor vehicle accident and other personal injury cases
...suffering but not mental anguish).] Mental pain and suffering also is a separate and recoverable item of damage. [ Parkerson v. Nanton , 876 So. 2d 1228, 1229 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (post-traumatic stress injury was not permanent and thus not compensable).] §2:74 Emotional Distress Florida ori......
-
Course and conduct of trial
...Absent a stipulation, statements of counsel not made under oath, such as in an opening statement, are not evidence. Parkerson v. Nanton , 876 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Istache v. Pierre Where responses to a request for admissions had been filed in error, but plaintiff’s counsel told j......
-
$______ GROSS VERDICT - INSURANCE OBLIGATION - MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE - UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COLLISION - PLAINTIFF CONTENDS TORTFEASOR SPED PAST PLAINTIFF AS SHE WAS TURNING AND STRUCK HER VEHICLE - RIGHT ARM FRACTURE REQUIRING SURGERY - RESIDUAL LIMITATIONS AND PERMANENT SCARRING.
...drug use caused or contributed to the damages claimed or negatively impacted on the plaintiff’s treatment, per Parkerson v. Nanton, 876 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The defendants sought, through expert testimony, to put on evidence that the plaintiff’s long-term use of drugs, addiction......
-
$______ GROSS VERDICT - MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE - DISABLED AUTO COLLISION - EXACERBATION OF DISC BULGES RESULTING IN MULTIPLE CERVICAL DISC HERNIATIONS WITH NERVE ROOT IMPINGEMENT - INJECTIONS, PHYSICAL. THERAPY, RHIZOTOMY, AND CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT SURGERY - SIGNIFICANT SCARRING AND PERMANENT LACK OF MOBILITY IN NECK - NECESSITY FOR FUTURE THREE-LEVEL ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION.
...drug use caused or contributed to the damages claimed or negatively impacted on the plaintiff’s treatment, per Parkerson v. Nanton, 876 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The defendants sought, through expert testimony, to put on evidence that the plaintiff’s long-term use of drugs, addiction......