People v. Bruce A.
Citation | 141 A.D.2d 736,529 N.Y.S.2d 593 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. BRUCE A. (Anonymous), Appellant. |
Decision Date | 20 June 1988 |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Vincent A. Malito, Lindenhurst, for appellant.
Patrick Henry, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Patricia A. Murphy and Barry Feldman, of counsel), for respondent.
Before BRACKEN, J.P., and BROWN, RUBIN and SPATT, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered May 28, 1985, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (four counts), after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was charged in a 57-count indictment with engaging in deviate sexual intercourse by means of forcible compulsion with his daughter. The crimes were alleged to have occurred once monthly from December 1978 through September 1983, when the complainant was from nine to fourteen years of age, excluding only May 1979 and June 1982 and including two counts for the month of July 1982. Each count of the indictment was identical to the others except for the month and year specified. The bill of particulars served by the People set forth the day of the week within the month during which the acts encompassed in each count of the indictment allegedly transpired, as well as the place of such occurrence.
At the trial, testimony was received with respect to well over 100 incidences of sodomy. On appeal, the defendant argues, as he did consistently throughout the trial, that the indictment was subject to dismissal inasmuch as it contained duplicitous counts. We reject this claim both on procedural and substantive grounds.
At the close of the People's case, the defendant moved for a mistrial on the ground that the People's proof for each count of the indictment encompassed more than one offense and, accordingly, rendered the indictment duplicitous. The court, in partial agreement with the defendant's argument, dismissed 30 counts of the indictment and found that the People had established a prima facie case with respect to the remaining counts. The defendant asserted a partial exception to the court's ruling, which was not directed to those counts of which he was ultimately convicted, counts one, ten, fourteen and fifty-seven, inasmuch as the People had concededly established the occurrence of specific incidences of sodomy. Accordingly, his claim is not preserved for review.
In any event, while the proof adduced at trial may have rendered the indictment technically duplicitous, under the circumstances, we do not view this as fatal. In People v. Keindl, 68 N.Y.2d 410, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 502 N.E.2d 577, rearg. denied 69 N.Y.2d 823, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 506 N.E.2d 539, the Court of Appeals discussed the prohibition against the inclusion, in an indictment, of duplicitous counts: ( People v. Keindl, supra, 68 N.Y.2d at 417-418, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 502 N.E.2d 577). This prohibition, explained the court, is ( People v. Keindl, supra, at 417-418, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 502 N.E.2d 577; citation omitted).
The concerns addressed by the Keindl court are not, however, implicated herein to the extent that the defendant may be said to have been prejudiced. Initially, we note that the defendant's ability to prepare an adequate defense was not impaired inasmuch as the intervals of time set forth in each count of the indictment were reasonable ( see, People v. Morris, 61 N.Y.2d 290, 293, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Stocum
...43 A.D.3d 553, 554, 840 N.Y.S.2d 250 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 965, 848 N.Y.S.2d 34, 878 N.E.2d 618 [2007] ; People v. Bruce A., 141 A.D.2d 736, 736–737, 529 N.Y.S.2d 593 [1988], lv. denied 72 N.Y.2d 954, 534 N.Y.S.2d 668, 531 N.E.2d 300 [1988] ). Moreover, after reviewing the trial evide......
- Wilson Omnibus Corp. v. Fallsburg Cent. School Dist.
-
People v. Rodriguez
...court and the defense counsel never raised any concern regarding an alleged uncharged offense (see, CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Bruce A., 141 A.D.2d 736, 529 N.Y.S.2d 593). In any event, the record fails to support this contention, since the court submitted the robbery of Calvin Joseph as the ......
-
People v. Sulkey
...instances were proved at trial, we conclude that dismissal of those counts as duplicitous was not required (see, People v. Bruce A., 141 A.D.2d 736, 737-738, 529 N.Y.S.2d 593, lv. denied 72 N.Y.2d 954, 534 N.Y.S.2d 668, 531 N.E.2d 300; see also, People v. Smith, 178 A.D.2d 918, 578 N.Y.S.2d......
-
The whole truth: restoring reality to children's narrative in long-term incest cases.
...People v. Gautier, 544 N.Y.S.2d 821 N.Y. App. Div. 1989); People v. Sosa, 535 N.Y.S.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988); People v. Bruce A., 529 N.Y.S.2d 593 (N.Y. App. (126) People v. Molineux, 61 N.E. 286 (N.Y. 1901). (127) Id. at 293-95. (128) Id. at 294. (129) Id. (130) See cases cited supra n......