People v. Caver

Citation425 N.Y.S.2d 381,74 A.D.2d 852
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Michael CAVER, Appellant.
Decision Date10 March 1980
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

John F. Kuhn, Huntington, for appellant.

Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Martin I. Saperstein and Anthony J. Girese, Mineola, of counsel), for respondent.

Before HOPKINS, J. P., and MANGANO, GIBBONS and RABIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered May 1, 1979, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of three years.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed defendant's contention that section 70.02 of the Penal Law violates the Constitutions of New York and the United States in that it imposes cruel and unusual punishment and abrogates the separation of legislative and judicial powers, and find this contention to be without merit (see People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, 371 N.Y.S.2d 471, 332 N.E.2d 338, cert. den. 423 U.S. 950, 96 S.Ct. 372, 46 L.Ed.2d 287; People v. Eason, 40 N.Y.2d 297, 386 N.Y.S.2d 673, 353 N.E.2d 587).

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Felix
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 Marzo 1982
    ...in order to determine this appeal. Were the defendant correct in arguing that the statute is unconstitutional (but see People v. Caver, 74 A.D.2d 852, 425 N.Y.S.2d 381; People v. Elliby, 80 A.D.2d 875, 436 N.Y.S.2d 784), he would at best be entitled to the exercise of discretion in sentenci......
  • People v. Felix
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 15 Febrero 1983
    ...of an ameliorating factor does not violate the due process clause of either the Federal or the State Constitution (see People v. Caver, 74 A.D.2d 852, 425 N.Y.S.2d 381). B No more violative of due process are the procedural provisions of paragraph (c) with respect to the hearing to be held.......
  • People v. Kepple
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 Diciembre 1983
    ...v. Elliby, 80 A.D.2d 875, 436 N.Y.S.2d 784, mot. for lv. to app. den. 53 N.Y.2d 942, 440 N.Y.S.2d 1041, 423 N.E.2d 407; People v. Caver, 74 A.D.2d 852, 425 N.Y.S.2d 381). That a mandatory sentence will be imposed is irrelevant. Mandatory sentencing schemes have long been deemed constitution......
  • People v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Enero 1985
    ...(see Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382; People v. Kepple, 98 A.D.2d 783, 469 N.Y.S.2d 801; People v. Caver, 74 A.D.2d 852, 425 N.Y.S.2d 381; People v. Velasquez, 107 A.D.2d 726, 484 N.Y.S.2d 84). Moreover, the sentence imposed upon defendant was the result of p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT