People v. Geier
| Decision Date | 15 November 1988 |
| Citation | 534 N.Y.S.2d 626,144 A.D.2d 1015 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William A. GEIER, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Garry Stephen Hanlon, Rochester, for appellant.
Howard R. Relin by Alan Cruikshank, Rochester, for respondent.
Before DILLON, P.J., and CALLAHAN, DENMAN, BALIO and LAWTON, JJ.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02[1] ). Prior to sentencing, the People filed a predicate felony statement asserting that defendant had been convicted of grand larceny in the third degree upon his plea of guilty on October 9, 1981. Defendant admitted that he was the same person previously convicted, but claimed that the prior conviction, based upon an Alford plea (see North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162), was unconstitutionally obtained because he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Following a hearing pursuant to CPL 400.21, the court found no constitutional infirmity in defendant's prior felony conviction and concluded it could serve as a predicate felony for the purpose of sentencing defendant as a second felony offender.
When a defendant challenges his previous felony conviction on the ground that the conviction was unconstitutionally obtained, it is incumbent upon him to prove the facts underlying his claim (CPL 400.21[7][b]; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 15, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). In our view, defendant did not sustain that burden.
The record reveals that defendant received "meaningful representation" within the constitutional mandate (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400). In addition, defendant's Alford plea of guilty represented "a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses open to defendant" (North Carolina v. Alford, supra, 400 U.S. p. 31, 91 S.Ct. p. 164; cf. People v. Harris, supra, 61 N.Y.2d p. 19, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). Although defendant was concerned about his poor health and physical condition, he nevertheless indicated he was willing to give up his right to trial by jury in return for a non-jail sentence. Thus, the court properly concluded that defendant's prior conviction could serve as a predicate felony for the purpose of sentencing defendant as a second felony offender.
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Silmon v. Travis
...future be held to predicate felony status based upon his plea (cf., People v. Long, 207 A.D.2d 988, 617 N.Y.S.2d 97; People v. Geier, 144 A.D.2d 1015, 534 N.Y.S.2d 626), or that his plea cannot be used for impeachment or collateral estoppel purposes in another legal forum (cf., Merchants Mu......
-
People v. Miller
...under an Alford plea may be considered in a determination of predicate felon status for sentencing purposes (see, People v. Geier, 144 A.D.2d 1015, 534 N.Y.S.2d 626). Thus, within the limits applicable to the admission of evidence concerning any other conviction (see, e.g., People v. Sandov......
-
People v. Miller
...(see, People v. Long, 207 A.D.2d 988, 617 N.Y.S.2d 97, lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 864, 624 N.Y.S.2d 383, 648 N.E.2d 803; People v. Geier, 144 A.D.2d 1015, 534 N.Y.S.2d 626). Further, as stated by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Hopfl (supra ), "[a]lthough [defendant] did not admit his guilt, no......
-
People v. Irizarry
...such a plea out of state or an alford plea in state do suffice as a prior felony conviction, People v Long, 207 A.D. 2d 988 and People v Geier, 144 A.D. 2d 1015. The defense counsel also argues the Court find the Defendant's statement pursuant to Exhibit 6, that is he admits to a prior felo......