People v. Glasper
| Court | New York Court of Appeals |
| Citation | 52 N.Y.2d 970,420 N.E.2d 80,438 N.Y.S.2d 282 |
| Parties | , 420 N.E.2d 80 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gregory GLASPER, Appellant. |
| Decision Date | 17 February 1981 |
The order of the Appellate Division, 73 A.D.2d 1064, 425 N.Y.S.2d 438 should be affirmed.
Contrary to defendant's contention, there was sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice. Although corroborative evidence must be truly independent, and may not draw its probative value from the accomplice testimony (People v. Hudson, 51 N.Y.2d 233, 433 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 414 N.E.2d 385), it need not itself prove commission of the crime. Rather, it is sufficient if the corroborative evidence tends to connect the defendant to the crime so as to reasonably satisfy the jury that the accomplice is telling the truth (e. g., People v. Cunningham, 48 N.Y.2d 938, 940, 425 N.Y.S.2d 59, 401 N.E.2d 182).
Here, the corroborative evidence independently established that the accomplice had participated in the criminal enterprise, and that defendant was in the company of the accomplice prior to and after the crimes occurred. In addition, a portion of a distinctive handkerchief worn by one of the perpetrators was found, partially burned, near a dumpster by defendant's residence. Finally, defendant's departure for Detroit and his statement that there was "some trouble," if interpreted by the fact finder as flight and an admission of guilt, respectively (cf. People v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 880, 410 N.Y.S.2d 806, 383 N.E.2d 108), would also constitute corroborative evidence. Cumulatively, these items of evidence were sufficient to satisfy the corroboration requirement (see, e. g., People v. Hudson, supra; People v. Cunningham, supra ).
We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that none warrants reversal.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gaiter v. Lord
...the truth. Steinberg, supra, 79 N.Y.2d at 683, 595 N.E.2d at 849, 584 N.Y.S.2d at 774; see also, People v. Glasper, 52 N.Y.2d 970, 971, 420 N.E.2d 80, 80, 438 N.Y.S.2d 282, 282 (1981); People v. Fiore, 12 N.Y.2d 188, 201-202, 188 N.E.2d 130, 136, 237 N.Y.S.2d 698, 706 (1962). 8 Petitioner a......
-
People v. Moses
...of defendant's presence at the scene and the false denial which the majority found sufficient (see, also, People v. Glasper, 52 N.Y.2d 970, 438 N.Y.S.2d 282, 420 N.E.2d 80; People v. Ruberto, 10 N.Y.2d 428, 224 N.Y.S.2d 1, 179 N.E.2d 848; People v. McGuire, 135 N.Y. 639, 32 N.E. 146). Here,......
-
People v. Steinberg
...of the crime was sufficient to permit the jury reasonably to conclude that Nussbaum was "telling the truth." (People v. Glasper, 52 N.Y.2d 970, 971, 438 N.Y.S.2d 282, 420 N.E.2d 80.) No more is There was also ample proof that defendant thereafter failed to provide appropriate and timely med......
-
People v. Konigsberg
...This does not mean, however, that the corroborative evidence must prove that defendant committed the crime ( People v. Glasper, 52 N.Y.2d 970, 971, 438 N.Y.S.2d 282, 420 N.E.2d 80; People v. Cunningham, 48 N.Y.2d 938, 940, 425 N.Y.S.2d 59, 401 N.E.2d 182). It is sufficient if the corroborat......