People v. Jourdan

Decision Date19 December 1968
Docket NumberDocket No. 3804,No. 2,2
CitationPeople v. Jourdan, 14 Mich.App. 743, 165 N.W.2d 890 (Mich. App. 1968)
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James M. JOURDAN, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan

Harvey R. Dean, Wall, Dean & Cyrul, Warren, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, George N. Parris, Pros. Atty., Thaddeus F. Hamera, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Don L. Milbourn, Asst. Pros. Atty., Macomb County, Mt. Clemens, for appellee.

Before T. G. KAVANAGH, P.J., and QUINN and MILLER, * JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was tried by a jury on April 12 and 13, 1967 and convicted of breaking and entering, M.C.L.A. § 750.110 (Stat.Ann.1968 Cum.Supp. § 28.305). Thereafter, he was sentenced. His appeal attacks the admission of his oral confession at trial.

This attack is based on the following facts: Defendant was questioned by the police October 5, 1965, at which time he was advised of his right to remain silent, that anything he said could and would be used against him in court, that he was entitled to an attorney and an attorney would be furnished to him if he could not afford to employ one. Defendant was not advised that interrogation would cease at his request and that he was entitled to counsel during interrogation, as required by Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. Johnson v. New Jersey (1966), 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882, made Miranda applicable to trials commenced after June 13, 1966.

Although the trial court determined defendant's confession voluntary and admissible after a Walker hearing, this Court is bound by the Miranda doctrine. People v. Whisenant (1968), 11 Mich.App. 432, 161 N.W.2d 425.

Reversed and new trial ordered.

* ALLAN C. MILLER, Circuit Judge for the 23rd Judicial Circuit, appointed by ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • People v. Mathews
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • May 22, 2018
    ...434, 437, 161 N.W.2d 425 (1968). See also People v. Hopper , 21 Mich. App. 276, 279, 175 N.W.2d 889 (1970) ; People v. Jourdan , 14 Mich. App. 743, 744, 165 N.W.2d 890 (1968). While nonbinding under MCR 7.215(J)(1), this Court's opinions indicate that to comply with Miranda , the police mus......
  • People v. Mathews
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 12, 2020
    ...appealed that ruling.2 Other opinions from the Court of Appeals followed the cursory analysis in Whisenant . See People v. Jourdan , 14 Mich. App. 743, 165 N.W.2d 890 (1968) ; People v. Hopper , 21 Mich. App. 276, 175 N.W.2d 889 (1970).3 See id. at 444, 86 S.Ct. 1602 ("Prior to any question......
  • People v. Tubbs
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • March 25, 1970
    ...he was not advised that interrogation would cease at his request. In support of this position defendant cites People v. Jourdan (1968), 14 Mich.App. 743, 165 N.W.2d 890. The brief opinion of this court was as 'Per Curiam. Defendant was tried by a jury on April 12 and 13, 1967 and convicted ......
  • People v. Hooper
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan
    • October 30, 1973
    ...61 (1971); People v. Pantoja, 28 Mich.App. 681, 184 N.W.2d 762 (1970). We are aware of this Court's decision in People v. Jourdan, 14 Mich.App. 743, 165 N.W.2d 890 (1968), where it was held that a subject must be told that questioning will cease whenever he indicates. However, after a caref......
  • Get Started for Free