People v. Lewis, 90CA2043
| Decision Date | 10 September 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90CA2043,90CA2043 |
| Citation | 849 P.2d 855 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maximillian J. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. . V |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Gale A. Norton, Atty. Gen., Raymond T. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Timothy
M. Tymkovich, Sol. Gen., Cheryl A. Linden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
Holland, Seelen & Pagliuca, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Denver, for defendant-appellant.
Opinion by Chief Judge STERNBERG.
The defendant, Maximillian J. Lewis, appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea pursuant to Crim.P. 32(d). We affirm.
Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion. He maintains that the uncontroverted evidence established that he was intoxicated at the time of his plea. We find no abuse of discretion.
Prior to accepting the defendant's plea of guilty to second degree assault and criminal possession of a second degree forged instrument, the trial court conducted an extensive providency hearing. At that hearing the court asked the defendant if he was taking any medication. The defendant stated that he was "taking Dilantin and Librium," but had not ingested any medication for two days. The defendant also stated that he felt "good" that day and that there was no reason he could not understand what was transpiring in the courtroom. His attorney stated that he had an opportunity to speak to the defendant at length that morning and that the defendant was competent to proceed.
At the hearing on defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, the defendant, his mother, and his girlfriend testified that he had drunk one and a half pints of wine before entering his guilty plea. The trial court found that defendant had consumed the alcohol and that it believed defendant was "influenced" by it. Nevertheless, the evidence in the record led it to conclude that defendant had the mental capacity to understand the providency hearing. We perceive no inconsistency in these conclusions: One can be affected by alcohol but still have the mental capacity to function intellectually.
The court also found that defendant was well represented and that counsel stated he was competent to proceed. The record of the providency hearing reflects that defendant was composed and articulate throughout the hearing and that he knew he was pleading guilty. Defendant is no stranger to the criminal justice system; indeed, on two previous occasions he had entered pleas of guilty. Thus, the procedures involved in entering a guilty plea in this case were not new or unfamiliar to him. Moreover, the record of the providency hearing itself contains nothing from the defendant or his attorney, either directly or by implication, that would indicate that the defendant was not competent to proceed.
In United States v. Teller, 762 F.2d 569 (7th Cir.1985), the court was faced with a factual situation similar to that presented here. Although Teller drank whiskey and took three quaaludes the morning of his hearing, based on the totality of the evidence...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Crumb
...must be manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable, or unfair. People v. DiGuglielmo, 33 P.3d 1248, 1250 (Colo.App.2001); People v. Lewis, 849 P.2d 855, 856 (Colo.App.1992). Here, defendant claims he had a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea because the district court judge impermissibly part......
-
Dominguez v. Archuleta
...of plea prior to sentencing, a defendant must demonstrate a "fair and just reason" for the withdrawal of his plea. People v. Lewis, 849 P.2d 855 (Colo. App. 1992).A defendant must also show that he was improperly influenced to enter a guilty plea although he had a defense, that he entered t......
-
People v. Karpierz
...not been supported by the evidence." The totality of the evidence presented supports the trial court's conclusion. See People v. Lewis, 849 P.2d 855 (Colo.App.1992). Thus, we perceive no V. Assistance of Counsel Finally, defendant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel be......
-
People v. DiGuglielmo, 00CA0402.
...Rather, a defendant has the burden of demonstrating a fair and just reason for the withdrawal of a plea. People v. Lewis, 849 P.2d 855, 856 (Colo.App. 1992). A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and its determination may not be overturn......