People v. Peacock

Citation496 N.E.2d 683,68 N.Y.2d 675,505 N.Y.S.2d 594
Parties, 496 N.E.2d 683 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cheryl A. PEACOCK, Appellant.
Decision Date01 July 1986
CourtNew York Court of Appeals

Robert H. Ballan, for appellant.

Charles A. Gardner, Dist. Atty. (Jerome J. Richards, Ogdensburg, of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the County Court, St. Lawrence County, should be reversed and the information dismissed.

Penal Law § 205.30 defines resisting arrest as intentionally preventing or attempting to prevent a police officer "from effecting an authorized arrest". The People concede that the officer did not have any ground to believe that defendant was committing, had committed or was about to commit an offense. That being the case, defendant's arrest was not "authorized," nor did her striking his arm in reaction to the officer's attempt to detain her constitute harassment.

There being no probable cause that authorized defendant's arrest, she cannot be guilty of resisting arrest. Penal Law § 35.27, as its title indicates, is concerned with the defense of justification and does not amend Penal Law § 205.30 to make resistance to an unauthorized arrest an offense (People v. Carneglia, 63 A.D.2d 734, 405 N.Y.S.2d 298; People v. Harewood, 63 A.D.2d 876, 406 N.Y.S.2d 44; see People v. Stevenson, 31 N.Y.2d 108, 335 N.Y.S.2d 52, 286 N.E.2d 445). To the extent that People v. Simms, 36 A.D.2d 23, 319 N.Y.S.2d 144, and People v. Lattanzio, 35 A.D.2d 313, 316 N.Y.S.2d 163, may be read to indicate otherwise, they are not to be followed.

WACHTLER, C.J., and MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JJ., concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
54 cases
  • Gibson v. Super., Nj Dept., Law and Public Safety
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 14 Junio 2005
    ...a peace officer from effecting a lawful arrest. (This is a common definition of that offense. See People v. Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d 675, 505 N.Y.S.2d 594, 496 N.E.2d 683 (1986); 4 C. Torcia, Wharton's Criminal Law § 593, p. 307 (14th ed.1981).) He then brings a § 1983 action against the arrestin......
  • Heck v. Humphrey, et al.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 24 Junio 1994
    ...a peace officer from effecting a lawful arrest. (This is a common definition of that offense. See People v. Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d 675, 505 N.Y.S.2d 594, 496 N.E.2d 683 (1986); 4 C. Torcia, Wharton's Criminal Law § 593, p. 307 (14th ed. 1981).) He then brings a § 1983 action against the arresti......
  • People v. Finch
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 13 Mayo 2014
    ...probable cause” (People v. Jensen, 86 N.Y.2d 248, 253, 630 N.Y.S.2d 989, 654 N.E.2d 1237 [1995] ; see People v. Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d 675, 676–677, 505 N.Y.S.2d 594, 496 N.E.2d 683 [1986] ). Thus the merits question before us is whether, on the assumption that defendant was in fact innocent of......
  • People v. Brukner
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • 31 Diciembre 2015
    ...(1931). Additionally, a defendant cannot be convicted of Resisting Arrest when the arrest is unauthorized. People v. Peacock, 68 N.Y.2d 675, 505 N.Y.S.2d 594, 496 N.E.2d 683 (1986). The People's assertion that, in bending the officer's finger, the defendant violated the "no-sock" law (Penal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT