People v. Pineda
| Decision Date | 27 August 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 25976,25976 |
| Citation | 513 P.2d 452,182 Colo. 385 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl Lloyd PINEDA, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., Donald M. Hoerl, James R. Guelin, Deputy Dist. Attys., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.
Rollie R. Rogers, Colorado State Public Defender, J. D. MacFarlane, Chief Deputy State Public Defender, Mary G. Allen, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellee.
This is an interlocutory appeal. Pending trial on a charge of assault in the first degree, defendant Pineda filed a motion to suppress two inculpatory statements. After a hearing, the trial court granted the motion. The district attorney, on behalf of the People, appeal. We affirm the trial court's ruling.
After being advised of his constitutional rights, the defendant made two statements to different interrogating police officers on December 17, 1972. The trial court found that these statements were induced by an implied promise by Officer Avery to the defendant that the defendant would receive some leniency in exchange for a confession.
The trial court's findings of facts on the voluntariness of a confession will be upheld by this court on review if supported by adequate evidence in the record. People v. Medina, Colo., 501 P.2d 1332 (1972); Gould v. People, 167 Colo. 113, 445 P.2d 580 (1968).
Officer Avery testified that he told the defendant '. . . that it would be easier for us to work on and also himself if he would tell us exactly what had happened.' The defendant testified that Officer Avery 'told me that it would be easier on me and him if we told him, if we confessed it happened.' The trial court found that this testimony revealed an implied promise which rendered the subsequent statements of the defendant involuntary. People v. Medina, Supra. The trial court's finding being thus supported by the record must be sustained.
The standards governing admissibility of a statement or confession made by one accused of a crime were summarized recently by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 1471--1472, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970), which held that the admissibility of a confession depends upon whether it was compelled within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. To be admissible, a confession must be free and voluntary. It '. . . must not be extracted by any sort of threats or violence, Nor obtained by any direct or implied promises, however slight . . .' (Emphasis added.)
Was the second statement made to Sergeant Lutes properly suppressed by the trial court by reason of the taint present in obtaining the first statement? We answer this in the affirmative. The facts in this case are similar to those in People v. Medina, Supra. In that case, the second statement was given to a second officer almost immediately after the first statement. Here, the first statement was given at 2:05 a.m. on December 17, 1972 to Officer Avery and the second statement was given to Sergeant Lutes at 12:55 p.m. on the same day. During the interim, the defendant was in continuous custody and did not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gimmy v. People
...by adequate evidence in the record. People v. Scott, supra; People v. Parks, 195 Colo. 344, 579 P.2d 76 (1978); People v. Pineda, 182 Colo. 385, 513 P.2d 452 (1973); People v. Medina, 180 Colo. 56, 501 P.2d 1332 (1972). Here, the trial court's finding that the defendant's confessions were n......
-
Kwiatkoski v. People
...States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); People v. Parada, 188 Colo. 230, 533 P.2d 1121 (1975); People v. Pineda, 182 Colo. 385, 513 P.2d 452 (1973). Other courts have held that when a confession is admitted into evidence, the trial court should correctly instruct the jur......
-
State v. Jerousek
...on the voluntary nature of a confession will be upheld by this Court if supported by adequate evidence in the record. People v. Pineda, 182 Colo. 385, 513 P.2d 452 (1973); See also, State v. Castoe, 114 Ariz. 47, 559 P.2d 167 We find that questioning a suspect before arresting him but after......
-
People v. Lowe
...compel us to conclude that the original taint had not dissipated at the time the 7:14 a. m. statement was made. See People v. Pineda, 182 Colo. 385, 513 P.2d 452 (1973); People v. Algien, supra. The trial court found that, even if it had determined that the taint of the original illegal int......
-
Section 18 CRIMES - EVIDENCE AGAINST ONE'S SELF-JEOPARDY.
...not be extracted by any sort of threats or violence, nor obtained by any direct or implied promises, however slight. People v. Pineda, 182 Colo. 385, 513 P.2d 452 (1973); People v. Raffaelli, 647 P.2d 230 (Colo. 1982); People v. Rhodes, 729 P.2d 982 (Colo. 1986); People v. Clements, 732 P.2......