People v. Roden

Decision Date15 February 1968
Citation235 N.E.2d 776,21 N.Y.2d 810,288 N.Y.S.2d 638
Parties, 235 N.E.2d 776 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James RODEN, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Joel A. Brenner and Anthony F. Marra, New York City, for appellant.

Isidore Dollinger, Dist. Atty. (Peter R. De Filippi and Daniel J. Sullivan, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed in the following memorandum:

We agree with the trial court that Coram nobis does not lie under the circumstances herein. We note, however, that we disagree with its conclusion that an unloaded gun is not a dangerous weapon within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 2124 of the former Penal Law. Of course, to this extent we also disagree with the holding in People v. Ahmed, 27 A.D.2d 729, 277 N.Y.S.2d 444, revd. on other grounds 20 N.Y.2d 958, 286 N.Y.S.2d 850, 233 N.E.2d 854.

FULD, C.J., and BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Archie
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1976
    ...weapon.' (Penal Law 1909, § 2124(1)). An unloaded weapon was a 'dangerous weapon' under that statute. (People v. Roden, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 638, 235 N.E.2d 776; People ex rel. Griffin v. Hunt, 267 N.Y. 597, 196 N.E. 598), and it was no defense that the weapon used was in fact u......
  • People v. Knowles
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 17, 1981
    ...154; People v. King, 13 A.D.2d 997, 216 N.Y.S.2d 755). This principle was overturned by the Court of Appeals in People v. Roden (21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 235 N.E.2d 776), which held that an unloaded gun was indeed a "dangerous weapon" for purposes of the former Penal Law. 2 However,......
  • People v. Baskerville
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 21, 1969
    ...1247). We have examined defendant's other specifications of error and find them to be without merit (see, e.g., People v. Roden, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 235 N.E.2d 776). CHRIST, Acting P.J., and BENJAMIN and MUNDER, JJ., SAMUEL RABIN and HOPKINS, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse th......
  • People v. Tracey A.
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • January 26, 1979
    ...the Penal Law, Chapter 88 of the Laws of 1909 and remained unchanged until the Penal Law was revised in 1967. In People v. Roden, 21 N.Y.2d 810, 288 N.Y.S.2d 638, 235 N.E.2d 776, the Court of Appeals held that an unloaded firearm could be a "dangerous weapon" in the case of a In revising th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT