People v. La Ruffa
| Decision Date | 26 December 1972 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas LA RUFFA, a/k/a Tommy Brooks, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before RABIN, P.J., and HOPKINS, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and SHAPIRO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 29, 1970, resentencing defendant Nunc pro tunc as of April 4, 1957, upon a conviction of murder in the second degree, upon a guilty plea.
Judgment affirmed.
One contention of defendant deserves discussion. He was indicted in 1952 for the crime of murder in the first degree. After a jury trial, he was convicted of murder in the second degree and was sentenced on October 9, 1952 to an indefinite prison term of 35 years to life. The judgment was reversed by this court and a new trial was ordered (People v. La Ruffa, 2 A.D.2d 765, 153 N.Y.S.2d 352).
At the time of the second trial in 1957, defendant pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree. When he appeared for sentence, he moved Pro se to withdraw his plea; that motion was denied and he was again sentenced to an indefinite term of 35 years to life imprisonment. No appeal was taken from this judgment.
As the result of a Coram nobis application, the 1957 judgment was vacated in 1970, because defendant had been deprived of his right to appeal. This appeal followed. Defendant now claims that he suffered double jeopardy for the reason that he was re-tried on the charge of murder in the first degree, even though at the first trial he was convicted only of murder in the second degree.
We see no substance to defendant's claim. Presently, the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Federal Constitution is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment (Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707; cf. People v. Ressler, 17 N.Y.2d 174, 269 N.Y.S.2d 414, 216 N.E.2d 582). It appears, moreover, that the application is retrospective (De Mino v. New York, 404 U.S. 1035, 92 S.Ct. 720, 30 L.Ed.2d 727, revg. People v. De Mino, 29 N.Y.2d 602, 324 N.Y.S.2d 402, 273 N.E.2d 133; Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323, 330--331, 90 S.Ct. 1757, 26 L.Ed.2d 300). In all of these cases, nevertheless, the conviction was obtained through a trial.
Here, defendant pleaded guilty; and, in our opinion, he waived the immunity of the double jeopardy clause. A plea of guilty waives all defenses to the indictment, except the jurisdiction of the court (Matter of D. (Daniel), 27 N.Y.2d 90, 98, 313 N.Y.S.2d 704, 710, 261 N.E.2d 627, 632; People v. Schiskey, 39 A.D.2d 608, 330 N.Y.S.2d 943). Defendant's argument...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Jones
...U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747; McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763; see, also, People v. LaRuffa, 40 A.D.2d 1022, 338 N.Y.S.2d 957, affd. 34 N.Y.2d 242, 356 N.Y.S.2d 849, 313 N.E.2d 332, rearg. den. 34 N.Y.2d 916, 359 N.Y.S.2d 1028, 316 N.Ed.2d 723, v......
-
People v. La Ruffa
...his plea constituted a waiver of any claim that he had been subjected to double jeopardy by his retrial for first degree murder (40 A.D.2d 1022, 338 N.Y.S.2d 957). Appeal from our court's affirmance of that decision (34 N.Y.2d 242, 356 N.Y.S.2d 849, 313 N.E.2d 332) has now brought the Supre......
-
People v. Jackson
...The error was not waived by defendant's plea of guilty. Although a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects (People v. La Ruffa, 40 A.D.2d 1022, 338 N.Y.S.2d 957, affd., 34 N.Y.2d 242, 356 N.Y.S.2d 849, 313 N.E.2d 332, remanded 419 U.S. 959, 95 S.Ct. 219, 42 L.Ed.2d 174, affd. on re......
-
People v. Mack
...not to do so, and instead pleaded guilty. By his guilty plea, the defendant waived all nonjurisdictional defects (see People v. La Ruffa, 40 A.D.2d 1022, 338 N.Y.S.2d 957, affd. 34 N.Y.2d 242, 356 N.Y.S.2d 849, 313 N.E.2d 332, remanded 419 U.S. 959, 95 S.Ct. 219, 42 L.Ed.2d 174, affd. on re......