People v. Sanchez
| Decision Date | 21 January 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 25597,25597 |
| Citation | 184 Colo. 25,518 P.2d 818 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
John P. Moore, Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Deputy Atty. Gen., E. Ronald Beeks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
Rollie R. Rogers, State Public Defender, J. D. MacFarlane, Chief Deputy State Public Defender, Thomas M. Van Cleave, III, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.
The defendant was convicted by a jury and sentenced to life imprisonment for felony-murder (C.R.S.1963, 40--2--3(1)) and statutory rape (C.R.S.1963, 40--2--25(1)(b)). On appeal, the defendant claims that his conviction must be reversed and that he must be granted a new trial because of errors that occurred in the course of his trial. He also claims that the evidence which was wholly circumstantial, was insufficient to support his conviction. In our opinion, the circumstantial evidence which encircled the defendant and linked him to the crime was sufficient to present a jury question. People v. Bennett, Colo., 515 P.2d 466 (1973). Our resolution of the issues which have been raised on appeal does not require that we detail the facts which surrounded this heinous rape-murder. Suffice it to say that the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Corbett v. People, 153 Colo. 457, 387 P.2d 409 (1963); Militello v. People, 95 Colo. 519, 37 P.2d 527 (1934).
The circumstantial evidence which was offered to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt consisted of expert testimony which tied physical evidence of the crime to the defendant. Hair and fibre samples taken from both the defendant and the victim's clothing, as well as soil samples and other physical evidence, connected the defendant to the victim, the garrot used to strangle the victim, and the place where the crime was committed. The evidence also established that the defendant had the opportunity to commit the crime. Moreover, the sufficiency of the evidence was not destroyed by an alleged weakness in the prosecution's proof of the chain of evidence. The chain of evidence was complete and not subject to attack in nearly every instance, and any weakness in the chain would go merely to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility. See Dechant v. People, 140 Colo. 558, 345 P.2d 723 (1959); United States v. Mendoza, 473 F.2d 692 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Von Roeder, 435 F.2d 1004 (10th Cir. 1971); United States v. Freeman, 412 F.2d 1181 (10th Cir. 1969).
Some of the evidence which the defendant would have us exclude was obtained after the defendant was advised of his rights, in compliance with the mandate in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). After the police advised the defendant of his rights, he voluntarily consented to a search for, and examination of, certain clothing which he admittedly wore on the night that the crime was committed. The defendant's consent caused any subsequent attack on the validity of the search to be without merit. In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973), the defendant, as in this case, consented to the search. No question has been raised in this case as to the voluntariness of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hayhurst
...179 Colo. 167, 498 P.2d 953 (1972); People v. Reyes, 174 Colo. 377, 483 P.2d 1342 (1971); Capps v. People, supra. Cf. People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974). The United States Supreme Court 3 and many state courts 4 have held that such an express advisement is not required by ......
-
People v. Lowe
...trial. Rather, each must be evaluated on its own facts. Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476; People v. Sanchez, Colo., 518 P.2d 818. We find no prejudicial error under the circumstances of this Appellant assigns as error the admission of a photograph of the ......
-
State v. Erwin
...a reasonable doubt, this Court will neither weigh the evidence nor appraise the credibility of witnesses." See also People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974); People v. Bennett, 183 Colo. 125, 515 P.2d 466 (1973); State v. Hix, 58 Idaho 730, 78 P.2d 1003 The majority relies on St......
-
People v. Saiz
...the necessary chain of custody to allow admission of the testimony. See People v. Atencio, Colo., 565 P.2d 921 (1977); People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974); People v. Smith, 182 Colo. 228, 512 P.2d 269 (1973). The cited cases make it clear that defendant's speculative argume......
-
Section 7 SECURITY OF PERSON AND PROPERTY - SEARCHES - SEIZURES - WARRANTS.
...was committed, the defendant's consent caused any subsequent attack on the validity of the search to be without merit. People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974). The university of Colorado failed to demonstrate that intercollegiate athletes voluntarily without coercion signed con......
-
Section 16 CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS - RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT.
...Geer v. Alaniz, 138 Colo. 177, 331 P.2d 260 (1958). Defendant is entitled to a fair trial, but not a perfect trial. People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974). Aim of a criminal trial is that the guilty shall not escape nor the innocent suffer an unjust conviction. People v. Roger......
-
The Use of Demonstrative Evidence in Criminal Cases
...v. Atencio, 187 Colo. 226, 529 P.2d 636 (1974). 8. People v. Smith, 182 Colo. 228, 512 P.2d 269 (1973). 9. Id. 10. People v. Sanchez, 184 Colo. 25, 518 P.2d 818 (1974). Regarding the sufficiency of a chain of custody where there has been the initialing and dating of the evidence and the sea......
-
Chapter 1 - § 1.5 • REAL EVIDENCE
...go to the weight, rather than the admissibility, of the evidence. People v. Atencio, 565 P.2d 921, 924 (Colo. 1977); People v. Sanchez, 518 P.2d 818 (Colo. 1974); see also People v. Lesslie, 939 P.2d 443 (Colo. App. 1996) (Once authenticity is established, defects in physical evidence go to......