People v. Thornton, 26155
| Citation | 187 Colo. 202,529 P.2d 628 |
| Decision Date | 23 December 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 26155,26155 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State-of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan THORNTON, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Colorado |
John P. Moore, Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.
Rollie R. Rogers, State Public Defender, James F. Dumas, Jr., Chief Deputy State Public Defender, Mary G. Allen, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.
Appellant was convicted of second-degree forgery, a class 4 felony, in violation of 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 40--5--103. He was sentenced to the state penitentiary for a term of five to nine years, from which he appeals pursuant to 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 40--1--509.
At the time of sentencing, on June 11, 1973, the penalty for a class 4 felony was not less than one nor more than ten years as provided in 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 40--1--105.
Colo.Sess.Laws 1973, ch. 145, 39--11--101(1)(b) at 503, and 39--11--304(2) at 504, were enacted effective July 6, 1973, and provide for the imposition of indeterminate sentences for class 4 and class 5 felonies.
It is the appellant's contention that the sentence of five to nine years imposed by the court under the circumstances of his case was unduly harsh and excessive, particularly in view of sections 39--11--101(1)(b) and 39--11--304(2), which became effective less than one month after his sentence was imposed.
We need not consider the alleged severity of the sentence in view of our recent decision in People v. Thomas, Colo., 525 P.2d 1136. In People v. Thomas we held that a defendant is entitled to the benefits of amendatory legislation which mitigates penalties for crimes, when relief is sought before finality has attached to the judgment of conviction. See People v. Herrera, Colo., 516 P.2d 626.
Although the procedure followed in People v. Thomas, Supra, was by way of post-conviction relief under 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 40--1--510(1)(f), there is no valid reason not to grant similar relief under the Thomas rule, where, as here, the application for relief is sought by direct appeal under section 40--1--509.
The People's contention that relief cannot be granted under section 40--1--509 because of alleged constitutional infirmities has been disposed of by our recent decision in People v. Carter, Colo., 527 P.2d 875, wherein we held section 40--1--509 to be constitutional.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Schuler v. State
...of Fourth Judicial Dist., 187 Colo. 359, 532 P.2d 340 (1975); People v. Race, 187 Colo. 204, 529 P.2d 629 (1974); People v. Thornton, 187 Colo. 202, 529 P.2d 628 (1974); and People v. Thomas, 185 Colo. 395, 525 P.2d 1136 (1974). The view that amendatory legislation mitigating the penalties ......
-
People v. Boyd
......¶ 20 A few months later, the court applied this doctrine to direct appeals, as well as postconviction motions, in People v. Thornton, 187 Colo. 202, 203, 529 P.2d 628, 628 (1974). The defendant in Thornton had filed a direct appeal under then-applicable section 40–1–509, Ch. ......
-
People v. Stellabotte
...C.R.S. 2015. The supreme court extended this rule to defendants seeking relief on direct appeal. People v. Thornton , 187 Colo. 202, 203, 529 P.2d 628, 628 (1974) ; see also People v. Russell , 2014 COA 21M, ¶ 12, 396 P.3d 71, 74 (cert. granted Feb. 23, 2015). Whenever constitutionally poss......
-
People v. McCoy
...expressly provides for retroactive application. Naranjo v. District Court, 189 Colo. 21, 536 P.2d 36 (1975); People v. Thorton, 187 Colo. 202, 529 P.2d 628 (1974); People v. Thomas, 185 Colo. 395, 525 P.2d 1136 (1974). The basis for these decisions was the provisions of section 18-1-410(f)(......