People v. Tosca

Citation746 N.Y.S.2d 276,98 N.Y.2d 660,773 N.E.2d 1014
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Decision Date06 June 2002
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN TOSCA, Appellant.

98 N.Y.2d 660
773 N.E.2d 1014
746 N.Y.S.2d 276

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
EDWIN TOSCA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 6, 2002.


98 N.Y.2d 661
Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Melissa Rothstein and Richard M. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (David S. Weisel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the police officers' testimony concerning an unidentified cab driver's report of a recent encounter with the armed defendant. The testimony was admitted not for its truth, but to provide background information as to how and why the police pursued and confronted defendant (see People v Till, 87 NY2d 835, 837). Further, the trial court twice explicitly instructed the jury on the limited use it could make of the testimony and that the testimony was not to be considered proof of the uncharged crime.

Finally, defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the prosecution's questionable remarks during summation, given the trial court's prompt curative instructions (cf. People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 111).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

To continue reading

Request your trial
103 cases
  • People v. Harris
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 14 Mayo 2014
    ...they had made to Warren which exonerated Sykes and implicated Corey McCollough in the Brown murder ( see People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 660, 661, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276, 773 N.E.2d 1014;People v. Genyard, 84 A.D.3d 1398, 1400, 923 N.Y.S.2d 883;People v. Devaughn, 84 A.D.3d 1394, 1395, 925 N.Y.S.2d 11......
  • People v. Larkins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 8 Mayo 2015
    ...531 N.E.2d 303 ), and to “provide background information as to how and why the police pursued and confronted defendant” (People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 660, 661, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276, 773 N.E.2d 1014 ; cf. People v. Resek, 3 N.Y.3d 385, 388–390, 787 N.Y.S.2d 683, 821 N.E.2d 108 ; see generally Till......
  • People v. Kims
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 15 Junio 2012
    ...People v. Davis, 23 A.D.3d 833, 835, 805 N.Y.S.2d 435,lv. denied6 N.Y.3d 811, 812 N.Y.S.2d 451, 845 N.E.2d 1282;see also People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 660, 661, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276, 773 N.E.2d 1014). Finally, we conclude that the court properly admitted in evidence the drugs at issue despite the ......
  • People v. Wallace
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 13 Mayo 2015
    ...was properly admitted to provide background information as to why the police pursued and confronted the defendant (see People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 660, 661, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276, 773 N.E.2d 1014 ; People v. Morris, 89 A.D.3d 1112, 933 N.Y.S.2d 598, affd. 21 N.Y.3d 588, 976 N.Y.S.2d 682, 999 N.E.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Hearsay
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2018 Contents
    • 2 Agosto 2018
    ...• he utterance actually or circumstantially reveals the state of mind of the declarant or the hearer. People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 276, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276 (2002); People v. Reynoso , 73 N.Y.2d 816, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1988); Yee Sing Tung v. Mon-Leang Mui , 260 A.D.2d 294, 689 N.Y.S.2d 46 (1st De......
  • Hearsay
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2020 Contents
    • 2 Agosto 2020
    ...• he utterance actually or circumstantially reveals the state of mind of the declarant or the hearer. People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 276, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276 (2002); People v. Reynoso , 73 N.Y.2d 816, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1988); People v. Mallo , 165 A.D.3d 495, 86 N.Y.S.3d 31 (1st Dept. 2018) (evide......
  • Hearsay
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2015 Contents
    • 2 Agosto 2015
    ...• The utterance actually or circumstantially reveals the state of mind of the declarant or the hearer. People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 276, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276 (2002); People v. Reynoso , 73 N.Y.2d 816, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1988); Yee Sing Tung v. Mon-Leang Mui , 260 A.D.2d 294, 689 N.Y.S.2d 46 (1st D......
  • Hearsay
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive New York Objections - 2019 Contents
    • 2 Agosto 2019
    ...• he utterance actually or circumstantially reveals the state of mind of the declarant or the hearer. People v. Tosca, 98 N.Y.2d 276, 746 N.Y.S.2d 276 (2002); People v. Reynoso , 73 N.Y.2d 816, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113 (1988); Yee Sing Tung v. Mon-Leang Mui , 260 A.D.2d 294, 689 N.Y.S.2d 46 (1st De......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT