People v. Williams

Decision Date01 March 2011
Citation82 A.D.3d 796,917 N.Y.S.2d 915
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ronnie WILLIAMS, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Michael O'Brien, Syosset, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), dated October 19, 2009, which, without a hearing, denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed by the same court (Gazzillo, J.), after a nonjury trial, on March 25, 2003.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

In order to be eligible for resentencing under CPL 440.46, a defendant must be in the custody of the department of correctional services, must have been convicted of a Class B felony drug offense under article 220 of the Penal Law that was committed prior to January 13, 2005, and must be serving an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of more than three years ( see CPL 440.46[1]; People v. Arroyo, 28 Misc.3d 1205[A], 2010 WL 2651649 ). However, the provisions of CPL 440.46 do "not apply to any person who is serving a sentence on a conviction for or has a predicate felony conviction for an exclusion offense" (CPL 440.46[5] ). An "exclusion offense"is defined as, inter alia, "a crime for which the person was previously convicted within the preceding ten years, excluding any time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of commission of the previous felony and the time of commission of the present felony, which was: a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law" (CPL 440.46 [5][a][I] ).

Here, at the time the defendant moved for resentencing, effectively on October 7, 2009, he was ineligible for resentencing. The defendant was previously convicted of assault in the second degree, a class D violent felony offense ( see Penal Law 70.02[1][c] ), and sentence was imposed on September 28, 2000, which was within 10 years of his motion for resentencing ( see People v. Hill, --- A.D.3d ----, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710, --- N.E.2d ---- [4th Dept.2011]; People v. Sosa, 81 A.D.3d 464, 916 N.Y.S.2d 72, --- N.E.2d ---- [1st Dept.2011]; People v. Green, 30 Misc.3d 1204[A], 907 N.Y.S.2d 362; People v. Arroyo, 28 Misc.3d at 1205[A], 907 N.Y.S.2d 362; People v. Walltower, 27 Misc.3d 1205[A], 2010 WL 1371963; People v. Danton, 27 Misc.3d 638, 645, 895 N.Y.S.2d 669, affd. 81 A.D.3d 464, 916 N.Y.S.2d 72, --- N.E.2d ---- [1st Dept.2011]; People v. Brown, 26 Misc.3d 1204[A], 906 N.Y.S.2d 781; People v. Roman, 26 Misc.3d 784, 786, 889 N.Y.S.2d 922; Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, CPL 440.46, 2011 Cumulative Pocket Part, at 32-33), excluding any time during which the defendant was incarcerated between his commission of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Foxworth
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Mayo 2011
    ...the date the defendant committed the felony drug offense ( see People v. Lashley, 83 A.D.3d 868, 920 N.Y.S.2d 421; People v. Williams, 82 A.D.3d 796, 917 N.Y.S.2d 915; People v. Hill, 82 A.D.3d 77, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710; People v. Sosa, 81 A.D.3d at 465, 916 N.Y.S.2d 72). Nevertheless, the Peopl......
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Junio 2011
    ...prior to January 13, 2005, and must be serving an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of more than three years” ( People v. Williams, 82 A.D.3d 796, 796, 917 N.Y.S.2d 915; see CPL 440.46[1] ). However, the resentencing provisions of CPL 440.46 do not apply “to any person who is serving a ......
  • People v. Lashley
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 Abril 2011
    ...the defendant's resentencing motion, rather than from the date that she committed the present drug felonies ( see People v. Williams, 82 A.D.3d 796, 917 N.Y.S.2d 915 [2011]; [920 N.Y.S.2d 423 , 83 A.D.3d 869] People v. Hill, 82 A.D.3d 77, 916 N.Y.S.2d 710 [2011]; People v. Sosa, 81 A.D.3d 4......
  • People v. Jefferson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Junio 2011
    ...weapon in the third degree constitutes an exclusion offense ( see People v. Foxworth,84 A.D.3d 1114, 923 N.Y.S.2d 206; People v. Williams, 82 A.D.3d 796, 917 N.Y.S.2d 915; Preiser, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 11A, CPL 440.46, 2011 Pocket Part, at 32–33). There......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT