Pettis v. State, 37656

Decision Date06 November 1950
Docket NumberNo. 37656,37656
Citation209 Miss. 726,48 So.2d 355
PartiesPETTIS v. STATE.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Ben Stevens, J. H. Stevens, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

J. P. Coleman, Atty. Gen., Geo. H. Ethridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ARRINGTON, Commissioner.

The appellant was convicted for unlawfully resisting J. F. Green, sheriff of Greene County, while he was in the act of arresting on Johnny Bolton, and was sentenced to serve a period of six months in jail and to pay a fine of $300.00, nine- days of the jail sentence and $150.00 of the fine to be suspended pending good behavior. The indictment was based on Section 2293, Code of 1942, and, omitting the formal parts, it reads as follows: '* * * did knowingly and unlawfully oppose and resist J. F. Green, who was then and there sheriff of Greene County, Mississippi, in attempting to arrest Johnny Bolton who was guilty of a crime in which said sheriff was then and there in the act of arresting or attempting to arrest contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Mississippi.'

The facts in this case are as follows: The sheriff of Greene County and his deputy had located some whisky in a house about a quarter of a mile from the place of business and residence of the appellant, Leola Pettis. According to the testimony of the sheriff, he apprehended a colored man in the shack where the whisky was found, who had the keys, using his language, to the place of abode of Leola Pettis and Johnny Bolton. The deputy sheriff testified that the whisky they located belonged to Johnny Bolton. Johnny Bolton at this time was asleep in the home of Leola Pettis, the appellant. According to the evidence, she also operated a business at her residence. The sheriff, upon locating the whisky, sent the deputy sheriff to the home of Leola Pettis to arrest Johnny Bolton. The appellant objected to the deputy sheriff's going into her home to arrest Johnny Bolton. The deputy then returned to the house where the sheriff was, and he and the sheriff returned to the home of Leola Pettis to arrest the said Bolton.

According to the evidence of the deputy sheriff, the sheriff did not ask the appellant if he could go into the house, but he proceeded in, and she grabbed him by the arm; that the sheriff jerked away and continued on into the appellant's home. The sheriff on this point testified as follows: 'We went in, and as I started into the place, she jumped up and grabbed me, and when she did I hit her with a black-jack and went on in. Smith was behind me. I left her. She came on in behind me and then Smith. She came in there. And, to begin with, she wanted to know on the outside, she wanted to know what we wanted. I said, 'We came to arrest Johnny Bolton'. She says, 'You can't go in there'. I said, 'He is in there'. She said, 'Yes' we couldn't go, so we did go. We went on in, and she just continued to come into us, fighting us. She was drunk, and we kept her knocked off with those blackjacks around there, and she started into the room where Johnny was, and we pulled her out of there.'

The sheriff and deputy sheriff both testified that they did not have a warrant for the arrest of Johnny Bolton, neither did they have a search warrant for the premises of the appellant, Leola Pettis. With reference to an arrest without a warrant, Section 2470, Code of 1942, is as follows: 'An officer or private person may arrest any person without warrant, for an indictable offense committed, or a breach of the peace threatened or attempted in his presence; or when a person has committed a felony, though not in his presence; or when a felony has been committed, and he has reasonable ground to suspect and believe the person proposed to be arrested to have committed it; or on a charge, made upon reasonable cause, of the commission of a felony by the party proposed to be arrested. And in all cases of arrests without warrant, the person making such arrest must inform the accused of the object and cause of the arrest, except when he is in the actual commission of the offense, or is arrested on pursuit.'

Under this statute an officer...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • State v. Gallagher
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • September 13, 1983
    ...(1971); State v. Cesero, 146 Conn. 375, 379, 151 A.2d 338 (1959); White v. Morris, 345 So.2d 461, 467 (La.1977); Pettis v. State, 209 Miss. 726, 730-31, 48 So.2d 355 (1950); Masden v. State, 156 Tex.Cr. 538, 244 S.W.2d 228 (1951); State v. Hooker, 17 Vt. 658, 672 (1845); LaFave, supra, p. 2......
  • Brendle v. City of Houston
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 2000
    ...a right to use reasonable force to resist an unlawful arrest." Taylor v. State, 396 So.2d 39, 42 (Miss.1981) (quoting Pettis v. State, 209 Miss. 726, 48 So.2d 355 (1950)). Therefore, we also vacate the charges against Brendle for resisting ¶ 34. THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHICKASA......
  • Keys v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 15, 1973
    ...was illegal, and evidence obtained by a search of her person as an incident ot the arrest was inadmissible. See also Pettis v. State, 209 Miss. 726, 48 So.2d 355. A search in violation of the rule of 'probable cause for arrest' is a violation of a citizen's fundamental rights. Myers v. Stat......
  • State v. Boilard
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1985
    ...v. Young, 100 Ill.App.2d 20, 23, 241 N.E.2d 587, 590 (1968); King v. State, 246 Miss. 86, 149 So.2d 482 (1963); Pettis v. State, 209 Miss. 726, 730, 48 So.2d 355, 357 (1950). Under both our constitutions, state and federal, a warrantless entry into a home by a police officer is presumed unr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT