Petty v. Petty

Decision Date28 January 2010
Docket NumberNo. 359P09.,359P09.
Citation691 S.E.2d 16
PartiesRita Lavonne PETTY, Plaintiff, v. Steven L. PETTY and George L. Petty, Defendants.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Steven L. Petty, pro se.

Christy E. Wilhelm, Concord, for Rita Lavonne Petty.

George L. Petty, pro se.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 680 S.E.2d 894.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant (Steven Petty) on the 1st of September 2009 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of January 2010."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of September 2009 by Defendant (Steven Petty) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th day of January 2010."

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Cushman v. Cushman
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 2016
    ...675, 680 (2005), and White v. White, 312 N.C. 770, 777, 324 S.E.2d 829, 833 (1985) ), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 363 N.C. 806, 691 S.E.2d 16 (2010). III. Denial of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Defendant argues first that the trial court erred by denying his "motion for......
  • Peltzer v. Peltzer
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 2012
    ...Petty v. Petty, , 680 S.E.2d 894, 898 (2009) (citations and quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed,363 N.C. 806, 691 S.E.2d 16 (2010).Stovall v. Stovall, 205 N.C.App. 405, 407–08, 698 S.E.2d 680, 683 (2010). The trial court's unchallenged findings of fact are pre......
  • Curtis v. Curtis
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 1, 2012
    ...to support them.” Petty v. Petty, 199 N.C.App. 192, 197, 680 S.E.2d 894, 898 (2009) (quotation omitted), disc. review denied,363 N.C. 806, 691 S.E.2d 16 (2010). “This Court is not here to second-guess values of marital and separate property where there is evidence to support the trial court......
  • Stovall v. Stovall
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 20, 2010
    ...----, ----, 680 S.E.2d 894, 898 (2009) (citations and quotation marks omitted), disc. review denied and appeal dismissed, 363 N.C. 806, 691 S.E.2d 16 (2010).III. Credit for Debt The trial court found that New Madison Tobacco Warehouse (“New Madison”) is a warehouse which “was purchased duri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT