R.C.E., In Interest of, 88-1841

Decision Date21 December 1988
Docket NumberNo. 88-1841,88-1841
Citation535 So.2d 673,14 Fla. L. Weekly 39
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 39 In the Interest of R.C.E., III and C.D.E.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Theodore M. Burt of Burt & Lancaster, Trenton, for appellant.

Karen J. Stone, Gainesville, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Appellant, stepmother of the minor children here involved, appeals an order granting visitation rights to maternal grandparents pursuant to section 61.13(2)(b)2 c and section 752.01(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). We affirm.

The appellant petitioned for the adoption of her husband's children from a former marriage. The maternal grandparents of the children filed a motion for visitation in the adoption proceeding. The trial court conducted a hearing on the visitation motion, found that it would be in the children's best interest to grant visitation privileges despite opposition of the father and appellant, and entered an order granting visitation. Subsequent to the order awarding visitation, the appellant's motion for adoption was granted.

On appeal, the appellant contends that since the natural mother had placed the children for adoption, Florida law prohibits visitation. The appellant, however, misconstrues the applicable statutes.

Section 752.01(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that upon petition by a grandparent reasonable visitation may be awarded to that grandparent, if, among other things, the marriage of the grandchildren's parents has been dissolved. Section 752.01(2) states the act does not provide for grandparental visitation rights for children placed for adoption under Chapter 63 (Florida Statutes) "except as provided in s. 752.07 with respect to adoption by a stepparent."

Section 752.07 provides that when there is a remarriage of one of the natural parents of the child for whom visitation rights have been established by a grandparent, "any subsequent adoption by the stepparent will not terminate any grandparental rights." (emphasis added). Thus, while section 63.172(1)(b) provides that an adopted person is a stranger to former natural relatives, Chapter 752 provides an exception to this otherwise strict provision. Accordingly, the right to grandparental visitation is not terminated upon adoption by a stepparent if the right of visitation had been established before the adoption occurred. See Mauldin v. Richter, 515 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Cf. Beard v. Hamilton, 512 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987). 1

Since in the instant case...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Beckman v. Boggs
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 1 Septiembre 1994
    ... ... , we must then decide whether awarding visitation in this case would be in the child's best interest ...         At issue in this case is the proper interplay between the State's adoption ... ...
  • Simmons v. Simmons
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • 30 Mayo 1995
    ...333 (1992); Puleo v. Forgue, 610 A.2d 124 (R.I.1992); In re Groleau, 585 N.E.2d 726 (Ind.App. 3 Dist.1992); In Interest of R.C.E., 535 So.2d 673 (Fla.App.1988); Santaniello v. Santaniello, 18 Kan.App.2d 112, 850 P.2d 269 The respondents urge the Court to adopt the rationale of Preston v. Me......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT