Ragland, In re
Decision Date | 20 July 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 12-98-00159-CV,12-98-00159-CV |
Citation | 973 S.W.2d 769 |
Parties | In re Stacie Lea RAGLAND, Realtor. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Deborah J. Race, Tyler, for relator.
Elizabeth Brice, Nacogodoches, for real-party-in-interest.
Before RAMEY, C.J., and HOLCOMB and HADDEN, JJ.
Relator Stacie Lea Ragland ("Relator") brings this original habeas corpus proceeding following the trial court's entry of an order of contempt against her for failing to disclose the existence of certain bank account records to the trial court and to Real Party in Interest John Ragland, Jr. ("Ragland"). The trial court assessed punishment at thirty days' confinement in the Nacogdoches County Jail. That sentence, however, was suspended and Relator was placed on probation for a period of one year during which time she was ordered to perform 200 hours of community service at the rate of four hours per week. Although this Court requested that Ragland respond to the petition, he declined to do so. Consequently, we have entertained the petition without benefit of response and determined that the petition should be granted.
In February of 1997, Relator filed a motion to modify conservatorship of the parties' two children over whom she had been sharing joint custody with Ragland. Ragland also sought a custody modification. In conjunction with the custody dispute, in June of 1997, Ragland filed requests for production. Request for Production No. 3 sought production of "all checking account statements (including At the December 22, 1997 hearing on Ragland's motion to compel, Relator testified that the only bank account she had was the one listed on the release form she executed. She also stated that she had told the bank to include every account she had, and the only one they listed was Michelle's account. She stated that although the account belonged to her daughter, she was an authorized signatory on that account. At the conclusion of the hearing, the following exchange occurred:
On January 16, 1998, at a follow-up hearing, it was determined that Relator, in fact, did have another account at the bank which she had failed to disclose. Although Relator testified that she had been unaware that the release she signed did not disclose this additional account, the court found that her failure to disclose the account was intentional and stated that it planned to punish her for contempt. Relator objected on grounds that there had been neither a pleading seeking contempt nor notice of a contempt proceeding. The court responded stating:
The contempt will come from the Court without any pleading from the party because your client was asked specifically three or four times on the stand. I'm proceeding under Rule 215, Section 6. That is a matter for the Court to take up on its own just because she told something that appears not to be true in court. She was adamant in the hearing as I recall that she had no other account.
Thereafter, the court pronounced punishment as follows:
Ms. Ragland, you will please stand. I find you in direct contempt of the Court. I sentence you to 30 days in jail. You may purge yourself of contempt of Court by performing two hundred hours of community service.
On January 28, 1998, the court signed an Order on Motion to Modify Suit Affecting The Parent-Child Relationship ("Order on Motion to Modify"). A paragraph within that order entitled "Motion for Contempt" reduced the court's contempt holding to writing. It stated:
MOTION FOR CONTEMPT:
IT IS ORDERED THAT STACIE LEA RAGLAND is in contempt of court for failing to disclose to Movant and the Court the existence of checking account records in the possession of 1st Service Bank of Chireno, Texas. Pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 215, IT IS ADJUDGED that Stacie Lea Ragland is in contempt of this court, and IT IS ORDERED that punishment is assessed at confinement in the Nacogdoches County Jail of Nacogdoches County, Texas, for a period of thirty (30) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that enforcement of this order is suspended and Respondent, STACIE LEA RAGLAND, is placed on probation for a period of one year on the following term and condition:
Respondent, STACIE LEA RAGLAND, shall complete two hundred (200) hours of community service under the direction and Subsequently, on June 24, 1998, Relator filed her petition for writ of habeas corpus raising two points of error.
supervision of the District Probation Department of Nacogdoches County, Texas. Four hours per week.
This Court has original jurisdiction over habeas corpus proceedings as set forth in Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(d) (Vernon Supp.1998). An original habeas corpus proceeding is a collateral attack on a contempt judgment. Ex parte Rohleder, 424 S.W.2d 891, 892 (Tex.1967); Ex parte Tanner, 904 S.W.2d 202, 203 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, orig. proceeding). The function of a writ of habeas corpus is to secure release from unlawful custody. Thus, it must be shown that the contemnor has undergone a restraint of liberty. Ex parte Crawford, 506 S.W.2d 920, 921 (Tex.Civ.App.--Tyler 1974, orig. proceeding). Although actual confinement is the typical restraint of liberty, courts have extended the meaning of the term "restraint of liberty" beyond actual imprisonment. The Texas Supreme Court has held that when a contemnor is sentenced to jail and released on bond pending review by habeas corpus, there is sufficient restraint of liberty to justify issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Williams, 690 S.W.2d 243, 244 (Tex.1985). The rationale is that imprisonment is not merely a speculative possibility where the unfolding of events may render the controversy moot. Id. Courts have also extended the meaning of restraint to include probation. In most of these cases, however, the terms of probation include some type of tangible restraint of liberty. See, eg., Ex parte Brister, 801 S.W.2d 833, 834-35 (Tex.1990); Ex parte Duncan, 796 S.W.2d 562, 564 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, orig. proceeding). Previously, we have held that a probated contempt sentence which merely required the relator to pay child support and attorney fee arrearages, comply with the terms of Temporary Orders, and pay related attorney fees and court costs did not constitute sufficient restraint to entitle him to habeas corpus relief, Ex parte Hughey, 932 S.W.2d 308 (Tex.App.--Tyler 1996, orig. proceeding). In the instant case, however, Relator was ordered to perform community service each week for a year under the supervision of the county probation department. We hold that the requirement of weekly community service over the course of a year constitutes a restraint on her liberty entitling her to pursue relief by petition for writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we will entertain the petition.
To obtain habeas corpus relief, Relator must conclusively establish that she is entitled to the writ. Ex parte Wagner, 905 S.W.2d 799, 802 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1995). As the court in Wagner noted:
A court will issue a writ of habeas corpus if the order, judgment, or decree underlying the contempt is void, [citation omitted], or if the contempt...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re J.C.L.
...restrictions imposed for failing to pay child support, and requiring father to submit to testing for drugs and alcohol); In re Ragland, 973 S.W.2d 769, 771 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1998, orig.proceeding) (reviewing a restriction requiring a person to perform a certain amount of community service ea......
-
In re Commitment of Richards
...(restrictions imposed for failing to pay child support, and requiring father to submit to testing for drugs and alcohol); In re Ragland, 973 S.W.2d 769, 771 (Tex. App.-Tyler 1998, orig. proceeding) (restriction requiring a person to perform a certain amount of community service each week); ......
-
In re Commitment of Richards, No. 09-05-503 CV (Tex. App. 9/14/2006)
...(restrictions imposed for failing to pay child support, and requiring father to submit to testing for drugs and alcohol); In re Ragland, 973 S.W.2d 769, 771 (Tex. App.-Tyler 1998, orig. proceeding) (restriction requiring a person to perform a certain amount of community service each week); ......
-
In re Clark, No. 10-03-00037-CV (TX 7/21/2004)
...by habeas depending on whether the conditions of community supervision include some form of "tangible restraint." E.g., In re Ragland, 973 S.W.2d 769, 771 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1998, orig. proceeding). Thus in Ragland, the Tyler Court held that the requirement that the contemnor perform communit......