Ramsey v. North Carolina Veterans Commission, 462
| Decision Date | 15 April 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. 462,462 |
| Citation | 261 N.C. 645,135 S.E.2d 659 |
| Parties | Cynthia Jeanne RAMSEY, by and through her Next Friend, Earle Gene Ramsey, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA VETERANS COMMISSION, Respondent. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Hamlin & Ramsey and Potts & Hudson, Brevard, for petitioner appellant.
T. W. Bruton, Atty. Gen., Ralph Moody, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent, North Carolina Veterans Commission.
Article 15 of Chapter 116 of the General Statutes authorizes a scholarship at any State educational institution for an 'eligible child' of a World War veteran as defined by G.S. § 116-149 and classified by G.S. § 116-151. It is conceded that petitioner's father is a veteran as defined by G.S. § 116-149(a). It is also conceded that petitioner does not meet the requirements of G.S. § 116-149(b) which defines an 'eligible child' as:
'(1) A child of a veteran who was a legal resident of North Carolina at the time of said veteran's entrance into the armed forces, or
'(2) A veteran's child who was born in North Carolina and has lived in North Carolina continuously since birth.'
The statute authorizes the Commission to waive requirement No. 2 under certain circumstances which have no application to this case.
It is petitioner's contention that in thus limiting eligibility for scholarships, G.S. § 116-149(b) unlawfully discriminates against her and other children of veterans who have acquired residence in North Carolina since their discharge from service. She alleges in her petition that the legislature has created an arbitrary and unreasonable classification which violates article 1, § 17 of the North Carolina Constitution as well as the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution.
It is a well understood rule of constitutional law that the General Assembly may distinguish, select and classify objects of legislation provided such classifications are reasonable and just and apply uniformly to all members of the affected class. Inequality does not render a statute unconstitutional if the selections are not arbitrary and capricious. The presumption is that any act passed by the legislature is constitutional, and the court will not strike it down if such legislation can be upheld on any reasonable ground. State v. Warren, 252 N.C. 690, 114 S.E.2d 660; Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home Stores, 242 N.C. 332, 88 S.E.2d 333; Leonard v. Maxwell, 216 N.C. 89, 3 S.E.2d 316; 1 Strong, N.C.Index, Constitutional Law §§ 10, 20.
By the challenged statute, North Carolina has attempted to provide for the education of children of her quota of one-hundred percent disabled veterans, that is, those veterans who were residents of this State at the time they were inducted or whose children were born and remained in the State. Prima facie, this is a reasonable distinction. Gianatasio v. Kaplan, 142 Misc. 611, 255 N.Y.S. 102. One who assails the classification in a statute has the burden of showing that it is essentially arbitrary and without any reasonable basis. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61, 31 S.Ct. 337, 55 L.Ed. 369. Neither North Carolina nor any other...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Guice, No. COA99-1261.
...is constitutional, and the court will not strike it down if [it] can be upheld on any reasonable ground." Ramsey v. N.C. Veterans Comm'n, 261 N.C. 645, 647, 135 S.E.2d 659, 661 (1964). An individual challenging the facial constitutionality of a legislative act "must establish that no set of......
-
Appeal of Martin
...Corp., 276 N.C. 108, 171 S.E.2d 406 (1970); City of Durham v. Bates, 273 N.C. 336, 160 S.E.2d 60 (1968); Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645, 135 S.E.2d 659 (1964); Convent v. Winston-Salem, 243 N.C. 316, 90 S.E.2d 879 (1956). When Mecklenburg County sought to assess the property of......
-
Standley v. Town of Woodfin
...is constitutional, and the court will not strike it down if [it] can be upheld on any reasonable ground." Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645, 647, 135 S.E.2d 659, 661 (1964). Similarly, "[a] municipal ordinance is presumed to be valid...." Currituck County v. Willey, 46 N.C.App. 83......
-
State v. Tutt
...constitutional, and the court will not strike it down if [it] can be upheld on any reasonable ground." Ramsey v. N.C. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645, 647, 135 S.E.2d 659, 661 (1964) (citations omitted). The unconstitutionality of the statute must appear beyond a reasonable doubt. Turner ......