Robinson v. Coulter
Decision Date | 22 October 1913 |
Parties | ROBINSON v. COULTER et al. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
The alleged libel was as follows:
Geo. E. O'Toole and John H. O'Brien, both of Clinton, for appellant.
David I. Walsh and Thos. L. Walsh, both of Fitchburg, and Jas. H. Walsh, Jr., of Fitchburg, for appellees.
DE COURCY, J.
A defamatory written statement which imputes to a contractor dishonesty or fraud in his business will in itself support an action of libel. Newell, Slander & Libel (2d Ed.) 195; Lovejoy v. Whitcomb, 174 Mass. 586, 55 N.E. 322. If the language of the newspaper article in question, taking the words in their natural sense, may fairly bear the meaning that the plaintiff dishonestly failed to comply with his contract to erect a school building, the demurrer must be overruled. 'It is only when the court can say that the publication is not reasonably capable of any defamatory meaning, and cannot reasonably be understood in any defamatory sense, that the court can rule, as matter of law, that the publication is not libelous.'...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Robinson v. Coulter
...215 Mass. 566102 N.E. 938ROBINSONv.COULTER et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Worcester.Oct. 22, Appeal from Superior Court, Worcester County. Action for libel by Andrew J. Robinson against William J. Coulter and others. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the amended decla......
- Holden v. McGillicuddy
- Holden v. Mcgillicuddy