Ryan v. Ryan

Decision Date05 September 1944
Docket Number38764
PartiesKathryn Ryan v. Charles M. Ryan, Trustee, and Individually, Augusta Ryan Goebel, George Ryan, Alice Ryan, Nancy Ryan Cable and Susan S. Ryan, Appellants
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Hon. Edward M. Ruddy, Judge.

Affirmed.

H.A. & C. R. Hamilton and Arthur Kreisman for appellants.

(1) The cardinal rule in the construction of wills is to ascertain the true intent and meaning of the testator from the language employed in the will and the surrounding circumstances. Sec 568, R.S. 1939; Hill v. Hill, 261 Mo. 55; Littleton v. General American Life Ins. Co., 136 S.W.2d 433. (2) This court has established as a fundamental rule in the construction of wills that the court will look to the general scheme of the testator as appears in the entire will, that is, as shown within its four corners, and, having ascertained its general intent and scheme, to construe its various provisions in harmony with and in subordination to said general scheme. Wiggins v. Perry, 271 S.W. 815; Coleman v. Haworth, 320 Mo. 852. (3) The provisions in the spendthrift clause and the restraints on alienation by the beneficiaries prevented any estate vesting in the beneficiaries until the payments were received by them or at the end of the 15-year term of the trust. Graham v Moore, 189 S.W. 1186; Matthews v. Van Cleve, 282 Mo. 19, 221 S.W. 34; Evans v. Rankin, 329 Mo 411, 44 S.W.2d 644; Gordon v. Tate, 314 Mo. 508, 284 S.W. 497; Citizens Bank v. Buford, 108 S.W.2d 1062; Partridge v. Cavender, 96 Mo. 452; Bixby v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 323 Mo. 1014, 22 S.W.2d 813; Jones v. Harrison, 7 F.2d 461; Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 298 Mo. 148, 249 S.W. 629. (4) The direction to the trustee to pay over and distribute did not vest any estate in the children. Buxton v. Kroeger, 219 Mo. 224; Holloway v. Burke 79 S.W.2d 104; Shoemaker v. Newman, 65 F.2d 208, 89 A.L.R. 1034; Skiles v. Bowling Green Trust Co., 171 S.W.2d 235. (5) The gift over to the children, after the termination of the trust estate, was a devise to a class to be determined at the time title vested in the class. Crecelius v. Horst, 78 Mo. 566, affirming 9 Mo.App. 51; Holloway v. Burke, 79 S.W.2d 104, 336 Mo. 380; Stolle v. Stolle, 66 S.W.2d 912. (6) The interests of the beneficiaries vested at the times fixed in the will. The income when paid into the hands of the beneficiaries, and the unsold real estate at the expiration of the term of 15 years. Buckner v. Buckner, 255 Mo. 371; In re Wood's Estate, 184 A. 13; 69 C.J., p. 1055, sec. 2254; 28 R.C.L., sec. 233; Humphreys v. Welling, 111 S.W.2d 123, 341 Mo. 1198.

George C. Mackay and James R. Anderson for respondent.

(1) If named beneficiaries are in existence at the time of determination of a class (in the case at bar at the date of the death of the testatrix) then in the absence of express words of joint tenancy or in the absence of a limitation over clause thereafter, a tenancy in common is created and the interests are vested in each of the said named beneficiaries. Scott on Trust, Secs. 113, 143; Thompson v. Martin, 281 Mass. 41; Shattuck v. Wall, 54 N.E. 488; Stanwood v. Stanwood, 60 N.E. 584; Elizabeth Trust Co. v. Clark, 126 A. 604; In re Lafferty's Estate, 59 Penn. Super. Ct. 24; Flanders v. Parker, 120 A. 558, 80 N.E. 566; Gardner v. Vanlandingham, 334 Mo. 1054, 69 S.W.2d 947; Holloway v. Burke, 336 Mo. 380, 79 S.W.2d 104; 69 C.J. 1053, sec. 2258. (2) A spendthrift trust clause can control a right of enjoyment, but does not prohibit or overrule the right of ownership or legal possession. Bogart on Spendthrift Trust, sec. 281, p. 258; 2 Restatement of the Law of Trusts, sec. 153; Munroe v. Dewey, 57 N.E. 340; Vellacott v. Murphy, 16 F.2d 700; McCreery v. Johnston, 90 W.Va. 80, 110 S.E. 464; Flanders v. Parker, 120 A. 558, 80 N.H. 566; In re Boies Estate, 35 A. 724, 177 Pa. 190; In re Lafferty's Estate, 59 Penn. Super. Ct. 24; Bogart on Spendthrift Trusts, sec. 92.

OPINION

Gantt, J.

Action for a declaratory judgment construing the will of Nancy A. Ryan, who died September 21, 1928. She had seven children. They were living and of legal age at the time of her death. At said time her son, Matthew J. Ryan, was single and unmarried. Thereafter he married. On December 31, 1934, he died without children. He willed to his wife, Kathryn Ryan, the plaintiff, all of his property. She makes claim under her husband's will to a one-seventh interest in the real estate willed by Nancy A. Ryan to her seven children. The other children of Nancy A. Ryan are the defendants. The trial court ruled that the plaintiff, from the time of her husband's death and under his will, had an equitable estate in the real estate devised by Nancy A. Ryan to her seven children, subject to the provisions of the trust created by Nancy A. Ryan in her will. Defendants appealed. The third section of Nancy A. Ryan's will disposed of her real estate. We divide the section into sub-sections. It follows:

(a) "All my real estate I give and devise to the trustee hereinafter nominated and appointed, and to his successor or successors, to have and to hold the same, in trust, upon the terms and conditions, and for the uses and purposes, and with the powers and duties following, that is to say: Said trustee shall hold, control and manage said real estate, and every part thereof, and shall collect the income and profit therefrom, with full power and authority in said trustee, at any time, to lease, rent, mortgage, encumber by deed of trust or otherwise, option, sell, convey, or otherwise dispose of, for cash, or for cash and notes secured by deed of trust upon the property sold, all or any portion of said real estate, in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as the trustee, in his discretion deem best and most beneficial. The trustee shall also have power and authority to hold any notes secured by deed of trust taken in payment of real estate sold until maturity and payment of said notes before being required to make distribution of same as hereinafter provided, as well as power and authority, at the time of any distribution, to withhold sufficient, in his discretion, of the cash on hand for the proper care, preservation and protection of the trust property. After paying the expenses incurred in the management of said real estate, including general and special taxes, insurance, alterations, improvements, repairs, assessments or charges of any kind levied against any or all of said real estate or the improvements thereon, commissions on rent collections or sales, together with reasonable fees to the trustee for his services, I direct said trustee to pay over, in convenient installments and at convenient times, but at least annually, the net income and profit derived from said real estate, together with the net proceeds of any sale, or sales, of said real estate, in equal shares, to my children, namely, Augusta Ryan Goebel, George Ryan, Alice Ryan, Matthew J. Ryan, Nancy Ryan Cable, Charles M. Ryan and Susan S. Ryan.

(b) "The trust herein created shall continue until all the real estate herein devised shall be sold and the income of said real estate and the proceeds of any sale, or sales, shall have been distributed, but not to exceed the term of fifteen (15) years next after the taking effect of this will.

(c) "At any termination of said trust the trustees shall make a full and final distribution of any money in his hands, in the manner and to the persons herein directed, and upon making said final distribution the trustee shall be fully discharged from all the duties herein conferred upon said trustee and his authority as trustee shall cease and terminate. If there be any of said real estate not disposed of at the end of said term of fifteen (15) years, I give and devise said undisposed of real estate, in equal shares, fully discharged of said trust, to my children hereinbefore named.

(d) "If my son Charles M. Ryan be deceased at the time this will takes effect, then the share of any distribution to be paid to him and the share of real estate unsold that would vest in him upon termination of the trust, shall be paid to and vest in, his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Wynne
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 5 Septiembre 1944
    ... ... (N.S.) 444; ... Mandelbaum v. Goodyear Rubber Co., 6 F.2d 818; ... Richardson v. Cheshire, 193 Iowa 930, 188 N.W. 146; ... Ryan v. Cooper, 201 Iowa 220, 205 N.W. 302; ... Coghill v. Boring, 15 Cal. 213; In re ... Brigham's Estate, 128 N.W. 1054; Jones on Evidence ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT