Sanchez v. Fernandez, 4D04-2544.
| Decision Date | 27 July 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. 4D04-2544.,4D04-2544. |
| Parties | Maria Julieta SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. Jesus Antonio FERNANDEZ, a/k/a Jesus Antonio Fernandez Zuniga, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Jose C. Bofill of Bofill & Vilar, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.
Jeffrey P. Wasserman and Robin I. Cohen of Shapiro, Blazi & Wasserman, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.
Appellant, Maria Julieta Sanchez, appeals a final order dismissing with prejudice her action against appellee, Jesus Antonio Fernandez, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to section 61.506(1), Florida Statutes (the "UCCJEA"). We reverse.
On or about February 6, 2004, Sanchez filed a petition for adjudication of paternity and awards of custody and child support. The petition pled that the minor child was born in Bogota, Colombia, and that Sanchez and the minor child reside in Bogota, Colombia. Fernandez is alleged to be a resident of Broward County — an allegation he does not deny. The trial court dismissed the petition with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the UCCJEA.
Whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo. See Jacobsen v. Ross Stores, 882 So.2d 431, 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).1 We hold, under the narrow facts of this case, that the trial court incorrectly applied the UCCJEA in dismissing Sanchez's paternity case. Where, as in the instant case, the putative father agrees that the mother should be awarded permanent primary residency of the child, custody is not an issue and the UCCJEA is inapplicable. This court has held that "[t]he UCCJA2 applies only to the issue of custody." Patterson v. Tomlinson, 875 So.2d 646, 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004);3 see also Wilson v. Zambito, 773 So.2d 581, 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (). In Keveloh v. Carter, 699 So.2d 285, 287 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), the fifth district held that, because the UCCJA applies to paternity actions where custody is in issue, the father's complaint to establish paternity invoked the provisions of the UCCJA where he "sought a determination of shared parental responsibility, custody and visitation."
We recognize that, according to the Florida Supreme Court, chapter 742, Florida Statutes, considered the "exclusive remedy for establishing paternity," provides that "any determination of paternity also involves a determination of custody." Amendments to Fla. Fam. L.R.P., 723 So.2d 208, 211 (Fla.1998).4 However, where the parties do not dispute that the mother shall retain custody of the minor child, custody is not an issue and, therefore, the UCCJEA does not prohibit Florida courts from maintaining subject matter jurisdiction over the paternity action.5
Based on the foregoing, we hold that the trial court erred in dismissing Sanchez's paternity action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We hereby reverse the order of dismissal and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
1. We note that the de novo standard of review used here for this issue is in conflict with the abuse of discretion standard of review used in the third and fifth districts. See Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 615 So.2d 241, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (); Munnerlyn v. Wingster, 825 So.2d 481, 482 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ().
2. Effective October 1, 2002, the UCCJA was amended as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) and renumbered to sections 61.501-542, Florida Statutes (2002). Patterson v. Tomlinson, 875 So.2d 646, 647 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
3. Patterson is not applicable to this case because it was decided under an old provision of the UCCJA which, unlike the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harshberger v. Harshberger
...have construed the UCCJEA as applying to paternity actions only when custody or visitation is an issue. [¶ 23] In Sanchez v. Fernandez, 915 So.2d 192 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2005), a Florida trial court dismissed the mother's paternity action against the putative father for lack of subject matter ......
-
Point Conversions, LLC v. WPB Hotel Partners, LLC
...This appeal followed."Whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo." Sanchez v. Fernandez , 915 So. 2d 192, 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). "Subject matter jurisdiction means ‘the power of the court to adjudicate the class of cases to which the particular c......
-
Blair v. State
...the double credit. This appeal follows. We review de novo whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction. Sanchez v. Fernandez , 915 So. 2d 192, 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Further, we review de novo all allegations of double jeopardy and illegal sentencing. Raja v. State , 317 So. 3d 139, 14......
-
Solar Dynamics, Inc. v. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C.
...of law that is reviewed de novo." Nissen v. Cortez Moreno , 10 So.3d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (citing Sanchez v. Fernandez , 915 So.2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ); see also Execu–Tech Bus. Sys., Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co. Ltd. , 752 So.2d 582, 584 (Fla. 2000) ("A trial court's ruling 211 ......
-
Determination of parentage - unmarried parents
...… The [UCCJEA] applies only when custody is at issue. Custody is not an issue in this case.” Similarly, in Sanchez v. Fernandez , 915 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), the mother filed a petition to determine paternity, custody, and child support. The putative father, a Florida resident, move......