Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.

Decision Date24 April 1990
Docket NumberNo. WD,WD
CitationSchaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345 (Mo. App. 1990)
PartiesErna SCHAEFER, et al., Respondents, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant. 41216.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

William H. Sanders, Sr., James H. McLarney, Kansas City, for appellant.

Lantz Welch, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and GAITAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This is a new opinion.

The defendantYellow Freight Systems, Inc., appeals from a judgment upon a jury verdict for $6,000,000 for the wrongful death of Charles F. Schaefer, Jr.Mr. Schaefer's death resulted from a collision between a car driven by him and a Yellow Freight truck.The action was brought by decedent's wife, Erna Schaefer, and his two adult children, Charles F. Schaefer III, and Karen L. Green.

Respondents challenge the finality of the judgment because it did not apportion the damages among the respondents as mandated by section 537.095.3, RSMo 1986.The language of the applicable subsection is as follows:

In any action for damages under section 537.080, the trier of the facts shall state the total damages found, or upon the approval of any settlement for which a petition or application for such approval has been filed, the court shall state the total settlement approved.The court shall then enter a judgment as to such damages, apportioning them among those persons entitled thereto in proportion to the losses suffered by each as determined by the court.(Emphasis added.)

We have no jurisdiction of the appeal if the judgment is not final.Section 512.020, RSMo 1986;Gurwit v. Kannatzer, 758 S.W.2d 486, 488(Mo.App.1988);State ex rel. Solid State Circuits, Inc. v. Springfield Mayor's Commission on Human Rights and Community Relations, 752 S.W.2d 72, 74(Mo.App.1988);Harris v. Union Electric Co., 685 S.W.2d 607, 610(Mo.App.1985).A final judgment is one which disposes of all parties and all issues in the case.Maurer v. Clark, 727 S.W.2d 210, 211(Mo.App.1987);Afshari Enterprises, Inc. v. Venz, 689 S.W.2d 846, 847(Mo.App.1985).

Our sistercourt of the Eastern District has held the judgment in a wrongful death case is not final till the damages are apportioned among multiple plaintiffs or beneficiaries.Bragg v. Missouri Pacific Railroad, 756 S.W.2d 666, 667(Mo.App.1988).It would be advisable for the trial court also to include in the judgment the provisions of subsection 4 of the statute.

The appeal is therefore dismissed and the cause is remanded to the trial court...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Kilmer v. Browning
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 12 d2 Março d2 1991
    ...In wrongful death actions the damages should also be apportioned as provided in § 537.095.3, RSMo 1986. See Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345 (Mo.App.1990); Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666 (Mo.App.1988). That occurred here, if somewhat belatedly. Certai......
  • Billingsley v. Ford Motor Co., s. 20220
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 3 d3 Janeiro d3 1996
    ...Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 908 S.W.2d 882, 883 (Mo.App.1995); Kilmer v. Browning, 806 S.W.2d 75, 85 (Mo.App.1991); Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, 788 S.W.2d 345, 346 (Mo.App.1990); Bragg v. Missouri Pac.R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666, 667-68 In addition, by not determining the amount of punitive damag......
  • Lavender v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 20146
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 1 d3 Novembro d3 1995
    ...remains in the trial court and is not lodged here. Kilmer v. Browning, 806 S.W.2d 75, 85 (Mo.App.1991); Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345, 346 (Mo.App.1990); Bragg v. Missouri Pacific R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666, 667-668 An insured has no obligation to assert a tort claim ag......
2 books & journal articles
  • Section 2.9 Final Judgments in General
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Appellate Court Practice Deskbook (2015 edition) Chapter 2 Appeals—Who, What, When, Where, and How
    • Invalid date
    ...counterclaim could not succeed). Additional cases illustrating the general principle include: · Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (failure to apportion damages among plaintiffs deprives order of finality); · Birdsong v. Bydalek, 905 S.W.2d 896 (Mo. A......
  • Section 38 Allocation of Damages Among Survivors
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Damages Deskbook Chapter 18 Wrongful Death
    • Invalid date
    ...are apportioned. Therefore, an appeal may not be had until the damages have been so apportioned. Schaefer v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 788 S.W.2d 345, 346 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (citing Bragg v. Mo. Pac. R.R., 756 S.W.2d 666, 667 (Mo. App. E.D. 1988)).For further examples of distribution and......