Schaffer v. Evans
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | COOKE |
| Citation | Schaffer v. Evans, 457 N.Y.S.2d 237, 57 N.Y.2d 992, 443 N.E.2d 485 (N.Y. 1982) |
| Decision Date | 09 November 1982 |
| Parties | , 443 N.E.2d 485 Martin B. SCHAFFER, Appellant, v. Herbert B. EVANS, as Chief Administrator of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. |
The order of the Appellate Division, 86 A.D.2d 708, 446 N.Y.S.2d 541, should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff's causes of action against the State officials are primarily claims against the State for money damages and as such could only be entertained in the Court of Claims (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd 4). Nor can it be said that the Appellate Division...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
Ott v. Barash
...jurisdiction over such a claim lies exclusively in the Court of Claims (see, Court of Claims Act §§ 8, 9; Schaffer v. Evans, 57 N.Y.2d 992, 994, 457 N.Y.S.2d 237, 443 N.E.2d 485; Parsa v. State of New York, 100 A.D.2d 899, 900, 474 N.Y.S.2d 562, revd. on other grounds 64 N.Y.2d 143, 485 N.Y......
-
Nassau Chapter Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 830, AFSCME, Local 1000, AFL-CIO v. County of Nassau
...proper procedural vehicle to resolve contractual rights. Schaffer v. Evans, 86 A.D.2d 708, 446 N.Y.S.2d 541, affirmed, 57 N.Y.2d 992, 457 N.Y.S.2d 237, 443 N.E.2d 485; Automated Ticket Sys. v. Quinn, 70 A.D.2d 726, 416 N.Y.S.2d 864, modified on other grounds, 49 N.Y.2d 792, 426 N.Y.S.2d 731......
-
Crist v. Rosenberger
...against the State can only be entertained in the Court of Claims ( Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd 4 )" ( Schaffer v. Evans , 57 N.Y.2d 992, 994, 457 N.Y.S.2d 237, 443 N.E.2d 485 [1982] ), the Supreme Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the instant matter. Morell v. Balasubr......
-
Montalvo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
... ... Cf. Schaffer ... Cf. Schaffer v. Evans ... ...
Get Started for Free