Seatec Intern., Ltd. v. SECRETARY OF THE TREAS., Civ. No. 81-329 (PG).
Decision Date | 17 September 1981 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 81-329 (PG). |
Citation | 525 F. Supp. 980 |
Parties | SEATEC INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico |
Nicolás Jiménez, San Juan, P. R., for plaintiff.
Secretary of Justice of P. R., Nicolás Jiménez, Jiménez & Fusté, Tomas R. Lincoln, Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P. R., for defendant.
This is an action for injunctive and declaratory relief brought by Seatec, a corporation engaged in the marine engineering business, to restrain the Secretary of the Treasury Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico from collecting the unpaid excise tax on plaintiff's equipment and to order defendant to refund the amounts paid under protest which we may conclude were unduly assessed and paid.
Plaintiff challenges the validity of the Excise Act of Puerto Rico, 13 L.P.R.A. § 4001 et seq., as applied to plaintiff in this case. It is plaintiff's contention that the above named statute is violative of Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause); Article I, Section 10, Clause 2 (Import-Export Clause); Article 4, Section 2, and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the sole ground that the Butler Act,1 48 U.S.C. § 872, prohibited suits in federal court for the purpose of restraining the assessment of collection of local taxes.
This Court has previously held that the Butler Act can not preclude the enjoinment of a Commonwealth's tax where there exists no plain, speedy and efficient remedy in the local forums. United States Brewers Ass'n., Inc. v. Pérez, 455 F.Supp. 1160 (D.C. P.R., 1978), 592 F.2d 1212 (1 Cir., 1979). According to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the district court's reluctance to read the Butler Act as an absolute ban is generally in accord with the limited case law applying this Act. United States Brewers Ass'n. v. Pérez, supra, at 1213-14, n.2. The First Circuit cites the following cases: Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Buscaglia, 140 F.2d 900, 901 (1 Cir., 1944); Sancho v. National City Bank of New York, 112 F.2d 998, 1003 (1 Cir., 1940); Everlasting Development Corp. v. Sol Luis Descartes, 95 F.Supp. 954, 958 (D.C.P.R., 1951) aff'd. on other grounds 192 F.2d 1 (1 Cir., 1951), cert. den. 342 U.S. 954, 72 S.Ct. 626, 96 L.Ed. 709 (1952); Boyce v. Buscaglia, 77 F.Supp. 753, 756-57 (D.C.P.R., 1948).
In order to decide whether we have jurisdiction in this case we must answer the question of whether the plaintiff has resort to adequate local remedies. It is defendant's contention that plaintiff has a sufficient remedy in the local courts under the general provisions of law covering injunctions, 32 L.P.R.A. 3521 to 3533, and under the recoupment procedure for taxes paid under protest, 13 L.P.R.A. 261 to 290.
In determining whether there existed an adequate remedy for injunctive relief in the Courts of Puerto Rico, the district court in United States Brewers Ass'n. v. Pérez, supra, referred to 32 L.P.R.A. 3524(7),2 and as to said statute stated at page 1163:
The procedure for litigating excise taxes is by review in the Superior Court of Puerto Rico of the determination of the Secretary of the Treasury refusing to grant a petition to refund. 13 L.P.R.A. 282. The recoupment procedure under the facts of the case at bar is not a plain, speedy, efficient, nor adequate remedy in the local courts. The holding of RCA v. Government of the Capital, 91 P.R.R. 404 (1964) that the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States does not apply to Puerto Rico, effectively forecloses whatever remedies the plaintiff could seek in the local courts. In Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Municipality of San Juan, 525 F.Supp. 533 (D.C.P.R., 1980) the court stated at page 545 that "in the absence of clear congressional acquiescence to the contrary, Puerto Rico...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Iberia Lineas Aereas De Espana v. Velez-Silva
...It does not apply to cases where the Commonwealth courts lack a plain, speedy and efficient remedy. Seatec Intern., Ltd. v. Secretary of the Treasury, 525 F.Supp. 980, 981 (D.P.R.1981). A state remedy is deemed to be plain, speedy and efficient remedy when it provides the dissatisfied party......
-
Crespo-Caraballo v. U.S.
...in the local forum, See U.S. Brewers Ass'n, Inc. v. Cesar Perez, 455 F.Supp. 1159, 1161 (1978); Seatec Intern., Ltd. v. Secretary of the Treasury, 525 F.Supp. 980, 981 (D.P.R. 1981). Crespo avows that in the present case Puerto Rico law does not afford a plain, speedy and efficient remedy i......
-
Lugo Rodriguez v. Puerto Rico Institute of Culture, Civil No. 01-2325 (JAG).
...absolute. It does not apply to cases where the State courts lack a plain, speedy and efficient remedy. Seatec Intern., Ltd. v. Secretary of the Treasury, 525 F.Supp. 980, 981 (D.P.R.1981). In this case the procedure afforded by the State legislature is plain, speedy and efficient. Plaintiff......
-
Del Valle Rivera v. United States
... ... UNITED STATES of America, Defendant ... Civ. No. 85-0144 (JAF) ... United States District ... ...