Shaad, Matter of

Decision Date14 November 1977
Citation59 A.D.2d 1061,399 N.Y.S.2d 822
PartiesIn the Matter of Robert B. SHAAD, Appellant. Lyman PECK v. William MOUSAW.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Robert B. Shaad, pro se.

Brown & Silver, Ross Brown, Morristown.

Before MARSH, P. J., and MOULE, DILLON and WITMER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

The court directed that appellant deliver his file in the underlying action to the attorney substituted in his place and allowed him a charging lien upon the proceeds of the pending lawsuit. The allowance of this charging lien was proper under section 475 of the Judiciary Law (see Matter of Regan v. Frisone, Inc., 54 A.2d 1125, 388 N.Y.S.2d 798; see also, Matter of Cooper (McCauley ), 291 N.Y. 255, 52 N.E.2d 421). The amount of such lien should be determined on a quantum meruit basis, i. e., the reasonable value of the services rendered by appellant. (Matter of Montgomery, 272 N.Y. 323, 6 N.E.2d 40.) It was not necessary, however, that the court make such determination at the time of granting the lien but, rather, it may determine the amount of the lien subsequent to any recovery in the underlying action. Furthermore, the amount of the recovery in that action is one of the elements to be considered in fixing the reasonable value of the services rendered.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • People v. Keeffe
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 1, 1980
    ...upon the proceeds of the lawsuit, the amount to be determined on a quantum meruit basis at the conclusion of the case (Matter of Shaad, 59 A.D.2d 1061, 399 N.Y.S.2d 822; Reubenbaum v. B. & H. Express, 6 A.D.2d 47, 174 N.Y.S.2d 287), and his fees will be made a charge included within the fee......
  • Universal Acupuncture Pain v. State Farm Mut., 01 Civ. 7677(SAS).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • November 12, 2002
    ...expended, since attorney was retained on a contingent-fee basis and plaintiff had not yet recovered); Matter of Shaad, 59 A.D.2d 1061, 399 N.Y.S.2d 822 (4th Dep't 1977) (holding amount of lien to be determined on a quantum meruit basis subsequent to any recovery in underlying While the clie......
  • Tops Markets, Inc. v. Quality Markets, Inc., No. 93-CV-0302E(F) (W.D.N.Y. 4/3/2001), 93-CV-0302E(F).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • April 3, 2001
    ...due and owing are paid. Security Credit Systems, Inc. v. Perfetto, 662 N.Y.S.2d 674 (App. Div. 4th Dep't 1997); Matter of Shaad, 399 N.Y.S.2d 822 (App. Div. 4th Dep't 1977); Steves v. Serlin, 509 N.Y.S.2d 666 (App. Div. 3 d Dep't 1986). New York courts "have, in many cases, ordered attorney......
  • La Mantia v. Durst
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • June 28, 1989
    ...The amount of the recovery realized in the underlying lawsuit also impacts upon the quantum meruit valuation. Shaad v. Mousaw, 59 A.D.2d 1061, 399 N.Y.S.2d 822 (1977). It is also necessary to examine any pre-existing partnership agreements between the members of the firms who now compete fo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT