Shaw v. Industrial Commission

Decision Date23 May 1973
Docket NumberNo. 10871--PR,A--1,10871--PR
Citation510 P.2d 47,109 Ariz. 401
PartiesDoral H. SHAW dbaCooler Pad Company, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Anna M. Parker, Respondent Employee.
CourtArizona Supreme Court

Spencer K. Johnston, Phoenix, for petitioner. William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Charles M. Brewer, Ltd. by Charles M. Brewer, and James D. Lester, Phoenix, for respondent employee.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, State Compensation Fund by James B. Long, Phoenix, O'Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, Westover, Killingsworth & Beshears by Donald L. Cross, Phoenix, Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, by William R. Jones, Jr., Phoenix, amici curiae.

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This is a petition by Doral H. Shaw dba A--1 Cooler Pad Company and the Industrial Commission of Arizona for review of two opinions of the Court of Appeals, the first, 15 Ariz.App. 573, 490 P.2d 18 (1971), setting aside an award of the Industrial Commission, and the second, 17 Ariz.App. 37, 495 P.2d 477 (1972), an opinion supplemental thereto. Both opinions are ordered vacated and the award of the Industrial Commission affirmed.

Respondent, Anna M. Parker, an employee of Doral Shaw, a manufacturer of excelsior pads for evaporative coolers, sustained an industrial-related injury on May 6, 1968. She had been employed by Shaw for a number of years, working approximately six months out of each year. The Industrial Commission on June 2, 1970, in its decision upon rehearing, made interim findings and an award. It found that as a result of the accident that respondent required back surgery, which was performed on October 10, 1969, that, because of a blood transfusion administered during the back surgery, petitioner contracted hepatitis, and that she was entitled to compensation for temporary total disability and for temporary partial disability. It further found that respondent's condition was not yet stationary and that her average monthly wage at the time of injury was $200.00, the statutory minimum. The Commission awarded compensation for both temporary total disability and for temporary partial disability, the latter from May 14, 1968 through October 9, 1969, and from February 9, 1970 until such time that the condition became stationary, and the former from October 10, 1969 through February 8, 1970.

Petitioner urges that since respondent only worked six months in a year she 'could only suffer a disability for work for six months out of a year,' and that, therefore, the payment of all disability benefits should be limited to six months out of a year. We reject petitioner's position and hold that respondent must be compensated for both temporary total disability and temporary partial disability for the length of time that such disabilities exist for the reason that the statutes of the State of Arizona so provide.

A.R.S. § 23--1044, subsec. A requires that compensation for temporary partial disability 'shall be paid during the period thereof.' A.R.S. § 23--1045, subsec. A provides...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Giles v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1977
    ...Ala. 69, 300 So.2d 106 (1974); Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School System, 536 P.2d 793 (Alaska, 1975); Shaw v. Industrial Comm., 109 Ariz. 401, 510 P.2d 47 (1973); Eugene Cervi & Co. v. Russell, 31 Colo.App. 525, 506 P.2d 748 (1972); Sauerman v. Stan Moore Motors, Inc., 203 N.W.2d 191 (......
  • Mail Boxes, Etc., U.S.A. v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • August 26, 1993
    ...18, 1990 notice of average monthly wage is res judicata for all purposes. In support of this proposition, he cites Shaw v. Industrial Comm'n, 109 Ariz. 401, 510 P.2d 47 (1973), and Robinson v. Industrial Comm'n, 14 Ariz.App. 541, 484 P.2d 1070 Although both Shaw and Robinson stand for the g......
  • Town of El Mirage v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • October 16, 1980
    ...578, 529 P.2d 732 (1974); Shaw v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App. 37, 495 P.2d 477 (1972), vacated on other grounds, 109 Ariz. 401, 510 P.2d 47 (1973). Cf. Powell v. Industrial Commission, 104 Ariz. 257, 451 P.2d 37 (1969) (where average monthly wage of teacher under 9 month contract he......
  • Bell v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • January 30, 2015
    ...deprive an injured employee with only TPD of any compensation.¶ 20 Our case law is also consistent with these conclusions. In Shaw v. Industrial Commission, we affirmed ICA awards spanning an initial period of TPD for approximately five months, followed by about four months of TTD, and endi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT