Sheats v. State, 28314

Decision Date08 November 1973
Docket NumberNo. 28314,28314
PartiesLafayette SHEATS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence.

2. The admission in evidence of the bullet was not error.

3. Refusal to grant a mistrial because of failure to testify was not erroneous.

4. The remaining special ground of motion for new trial is deemed abandoned.

Denny C. Galis, Athens, for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, Dist. Atty., Athens, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, David L. G. King, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

GRICE, Presiding Justice.

Lafayette Sheats, having been denied a new trial following his conviction for attempted armed robbery and murder, appeals to this court. He, Ronnie Sims and Michael T. Arnold were indicted by the Grand Jury of Clarke County and upon separate trial Sheats was found guilty and received sentence of ten years confinement and death by electrocution. Subsequently, the trial court determined that there was no constitutionally valid penalty in this state for the crime of murder when the offense was committed or when he was tried except life imprisonment. Therefore it vacated the sentence of death by electrocution and imposed a sentence of life imprisonment. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346; Sullivan v. State, 229 Ga. 731, 194 S.E.2d 410.

The appellant's amended motion for new trial asserted the general grounds and three special grounds.

1. The general grounds are clearly without merit since the evidence amply supported the verdict.

The evidence of Sims and Arnold, insofar as necessary to recite here, was as follows: that during the early morning the appellant, Arnold and Sims drove to a motel in the City of Athens; that Sims remained in the automobile; that the appellant and Arnold armed with pistols summoned the night clerk; that after some words with him, they demanded that he turn over to them what money he had; that upon seeing that he had a pistol they began to run; that shooting ensued in which the victim was shot and died shortly thereafter. Subsequently the appellant admitted to Sims that he shot the victim.

The appellant, in a written statement, substantially corroborated the testimony of Sims and Arnold, but denied that he shot him, stating that he fired into the air. Arnold, in his sworn testimony, likewise claimed that he merely fired into the air.

A pistol identified as having been in the appellant's possession in the robbery and a bullet taken from the victim's body were given a ballistics test. A State Crime Labwitness testified that this bullet could have been fired from the pistol.

2. One of the special grounds of the motion for new trial was in substance that the trial court erred in admitting the bullet into evidence, urging that its whereabouts until presented at the trial was not shown.

This...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Moore v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 12, 1975
    ...231 Ga. 472, 202 S.E.2d 298; Johnson v. State, 231 Ga. 138, 200 S.E.2d 734; Pierce v. State, 231 Ga. 731, 204 S.E.2d 159; Shorts v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 201 S.E.2d 420; Emmett v. State, 232 Ga. 110, 205 S.E.2d ...
  • Department of Transp. v. Hardin, 28311
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 8, 1973
    ... ... which it does not wish to plead and condemn; and would violate the due process clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions, in that it would deprive the state and the taxpayers thereof of their ... ...
  • Collins v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 2014
    ...based on a question posed to his co-defendant, which Collins has failed to show prejudiced him in any way. See Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 363–364(3), 201 S.E.2d 420 (1973) (no error in refusing to grant mistrial where prosecutor referred to co-indictees' right not to testify, but made no......
  • Eades v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 3, 1974
    ...control of the Atlanta Police Department. A similar chain of custody as was established here was found satisfactory in Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 201 S.E.2d 420. The evidence amply supports the verdict and the trial court did not err in denying the motion for a directed 2. Appellant cont......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT