Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc., C7-87-1797

Decision Date01 March 1988
Docket NumberNo. C7-87-1797,C7-87-1797
Citation419 N.W.2d 818
CourtMinnesota Court of Appeals
PartiesSHERBROOK COMPANY, Respondent, v. E & H EARTH MOVERS, INC., Appellant.

Syllabus by the Court

Respondent's claim is not barred by Minn.Stat. Sec. 541.051 (1984).

Appeal from District Court Anoka County; Hon. Edward F. Coleman, Judge.

Virgil C. Herrick, Herrick & Newman, P.A., Fridley, for Sherbrook Co.

Michael S. Kreidler, Lasley, Gaughan, Stich & Angell, P.A., Minneapolis, for E & H Earth Movers, Inc. Heard, considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This appeal is from an amended order denying E & H Earth Movers' motion for dismissal and certifying the issues raised in that motion as important and doubtful under Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.03(h). We affirm the trial court's disposition of the motion.

FACTS

The facts are not in dispute. Respondent Sherbrook Company ("Sherbrook"), a property developer, contracted with appellant, E & H Earth Movers ("E & H"), on October 13, 1978. E & H agreed to grade and grub property and render it suitable for building foundations. E & H substantially completed the work by July 31, 1980.

Sherbrook discovered a material breach of the contract on July 1, 1983, when soil tests showed that the land was improperly prepared for building sites. Sherbrook brought this action for breach of contract, and personally served E & H with a complaint on October 30, 1985.

In its answer, E & H denied the breach and asserted that Sherbrook's claim was untimely under the two-year limitation provided in Minn.Stat. Sec. 541.051 (1984). E & H thereafter moved for dismissal.

In denying the motion, the trial court concluded that the two-year limitation did not bar the claim because

the statutory words "defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property" do not apply to the [E & H's] soil correction activities involved here.

ISSUE

Did the trial court err in determining that the two-year limitation of Minn.Stat. Sec. 541.051 (1984) did not apply to this breach of contract claim?

ANALYSIS

Minn.Stat. Sec. 541.051, subd. 1 (1984) provides in part:

Except where fraud is involved, no action by any person in contract, tort, or otherwise to recover damages * * * arising out of the defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property * * * shall be brought more than two years after the discovery thereof * * *.

(Emphasis added.)

Sherbrook's claim is based solely on a defective improvement, not on an injury arising from an unsafe condition. Our supreme court has applied the statute only to claims involving an injury caused by a defective and unsafe condition in an improvement. See Wittmer v. Ruegemer, 419 N.W.2d 493 (Minn.1988) (flooding caused by defective septic system); Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co., 402 N.W.2d 794 (Minn.1987) (explosion caused by defective switchboard); Bulau v. Hector Plumbing and Heating Co., 402 N.W.2d 528 (Minn.1987) (fire caused by defective fireplace); Ocel v. City of Eagan, 402 N.W.2d 531 (Minn.1987) (flooding caused by defective sewage system); Lovgren v. Peoples Electric Co., 380 N.W.2d 791 (Minn.1986) (electric shock caused by defective transformer vault); Calder v. City of Crystal, 318 N.W.2d 838 (Minn.1982) (flooding caused by defective drainage system); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St. Paul, 316 N.W.2d 554 (Minn.1982) (flooding caused by defective sewage system); Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548 (Minn.1977) (fire caused by defective furnace). The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc., C9-91-686
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • September 24, 1991
    ...as, for example, when a building might fall onto another building. The trial court in this case relied on Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc., 419 N.W.2d 818, 819 (Minn.App.1988), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Apr. 20, 1988), for its interpretation. The Sherbrook court stated: Our Supre......
  • Griebel v. Andersen Corp., C6-90-2322
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • September 18, 1992
    ...419 N.W.2d 493 (Minn.1988). In reversing, the court of appeals relied upon its own earlier decision in Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc., 419 N.W.2d 818 (Minn.App.1988), pet. for rev. denied (Minn., filed April 20, 1988) to conclude that Minn.Stat. § 541.051 (1988) is inapplicable b......
  • Mattson v. Thompson
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 2011
    ...expressly applies to disputes arising from defective and unsafe improvements to real property. Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc., 419 N.W.2d 818, 819 (Minn. App. 1988), review denied (Minn. Apr. 20, 1988). "The question of whether injury to property arises out of a defective or unsa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT