De Silva v. State

Decision Date17 December 1924
Docket Number(No. 8561.)
Citation267 S.W. 271
PartiesDE SILVA v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; E. A. McDowell, Judge.

Newt De Silva, after conviction for murder, raised issue of insanity. From judgment on verdict finding him sane, he appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Howth, Adams, O'Fiel & Hart, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Atty., and Grover C. Morris, Asst. State's Atty., both of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

In March, 1922, the appellant was convicted of the offense of murder committed earlier in that year and the death penalty assessed against him. The issue of insanity was not raised at the trial, but subsequently, in July, 1923, because of the affidavit filed by his mother in the district court in which he had been tried for murder, the jury was called upon in accordance with the statute, to determine whether or not the appellant was insane. See Vernon's Ann. C. C. P. 1916, tit. 12, c. 1. After the motion to change the venue was overruled, the issue was tried, and in November, 1923, the jury, by a verdict rendered and received by the court, determined the appellant to be sane. From the judgment entered in the district court declaring him sane, this appeal is attempted, with various complaints of the rulings of the trial court during the procedure.

The concluding article of the statute mentioned reads thus:

"When, upon the trial of an issue of insanity, it is found that the defendant is sane, the judgment of conviction shall be enforced as if no such inquiry had been made." Article 1030, C. C. P.

We feel constrained to dismiss the appeal for the reason that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. In article 5, § 5, of the Constitution of Texas, the appellate jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeals is declared to be "coextensive with the limits of the state in all criminal cases of whatever grade, with such exceptions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by law." The court and the judges thereof have the power to issue the writ of habeas corpus under such regulations as may be prescribed by law. It is within the power of the Legislature to make proper exceptions to the right of appeal and to prescribe regulations in regard to the appellate jurisdiction of this court. See Johnson v. State, 42 Tex. Cr. R. 103, 58 S. W. 69. In the Legislative enactments found in our Code, appeals to this court are restricted to persons convicted of offenses...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Morgan v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 6, 1985
    ...and promulgate rules to be observed in prosecuting an appeal." 21 Tex.Jur.3rd, Crim.Law, § 1606, p. 404; De Silva v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 499, 267 S.W. 271 (1925). Prior to the 1977 amendment Article 44.02, V.A.C.C.P., simply "A defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under ......
  • Ex parte Rathmell
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 17, 1986
    ...and promulgate rules to be observed in prosecuting an appeal." 21 Tex.Jur.3rd, Crim.Law, § 1606, p. 404; De Silva v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 499, 267 S.W. 271 (1925). It has been said that in absence of constitutional inhibition, the Legislature may prescribe the cases in which parties shall be......
  • Homan v. Hughes, 69556
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 23, 1986
    ...jurisdiction, and promulgate rules to be observed in prosecuting an appeal." 21 Tex.Jur.3rd, Crim.Law, § 1606, p. 404; De Silva v. State, 267 S.W. 271 (Tex.Cr.App.1925). It has been said that in absence of constitutional inhibition, the Legislature may prescribe the cases in which parties s......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 16, 1977
    ...84, 299 S.W. 435; Holland v. State, 52 Tex.Cr.R. 160, 105 S.W. 812; Ex parte Morris, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 256, 257 S.W. 894; DeSilva v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 499, 267 S.W. 271; Boehme v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 358, 264 S.W.2d 118; Ex parte Hodges, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 433, 314 S.W.2d 581. These cases dealt wi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT