Simmons' Adm'r v. Simmons
Decision Date | 18 October 1912 |
Citation | 150 S.W. 59,150 Ky. 85 |
Parties | SIMMONS' ADM'R et al. v. SIMMONS. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, McCracken County.
Action by S. R. Simmons against U. A. Simmons' administrator and others. From a judgment for plaintiff on demurrer to the answer, defendant named and another appeal. Reversed, with instructions to overrule demurrer, and for further proceedings.
Berry & Grassham and A. W. Barkley, all of Paducah, for appellants.
Hendrick & Crice, of Paducah, for appellee.
The appellee, S. R. Simmons, owned a life estate in a farm of 110 acres in McCracken county, and his wife, U. A. Simmons, now deceased, owned the remainder therein. Irreconcilable differences having arisen between them, they agreed, on March 10, 1908, to live separately and apart thereafter. As a part of the agreement of separation, S. R. Simmons sold and conveyed to his wife his life interest in the farm for $1,000 in cash, which she paid him. This deed was dated March 10 1908, and recites that S. R. Simmons sold to his wife "all the right, title and interest which the party of the first part may now or hereafter have" in and to the land therein conveyed. Said deed contains this further provision:
On the same day S. R. Simmons and U. A. Simmons, his wife, conveyed the land to Eugene Foster, in trust for the use and benefit of U. A. Simmons. This last-mentioned deed recites that U. A. Simmons, the wife, owned a life estate in the farm above referred to; that S. R. Simmons then owned the "reversion" therein; that said U. A. Simmons had that day purchased S. R. Simmons' "reversionary" interest for $1,000; and that said S. R. Simmons and U. A. Simmons, "desiring to place the title to said property in such condition that it can be disposed of by will or deed by the said U. A. Simmons, without her husband, S. R. Simmons, joining in the conveyance thereof," the deed of trust was made to Eugene Foster, "for the purpose of accomplishing the object and purposes hereinabove set forth."
This deed contains this further covenant on the part of the grantors, R. S. Simmons and U. A. Simmons, immediately following the description of the land, to wit:
On the same day Mrs. U. A. Simmons executed her will, to which her husband formally consented in writing. The will and the consent read as follows:
The farm was sold during Mrs. Simmons' lifetime, and she died in March, 1911, leaving, after the payment of her debts and funeral expenses, $3,336.85 in cash and notes, which represented the unexpended portion of the proceeds of the sale of the farm. Mrs. Simmons will was duly probated in March, 1911; and in that month S. R. Simmons renounced the provisions of her will, and claimed and asserted his marital rights under the Kentucky statutes by a written instrument duly signed and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kirby v. Kent
... ... Davis, 106 Cal. 453, 39 P. 736; Kaiser's Estate, 199 Pa ... 269, 85 Am. St. Rep. 785; Simmons v. Simmons, 150 ... Ky. 85, 150 S.W. 59; In re Jeannot, 212 Mich. 442, ... 180 N.W. 482; Rhoades ... ...
-
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Ward
...used. Newell v. Burnside Banking Co. (Ky.) 118 S.W. 267. Nothing was claimed by the appellees in derogation of their deed (Simmons v. Simmons, 150 Ky. 88, 150 S.W. 59), and the transaction contained none of the essential elements of an equitable estoppel. In order to constitute an estoppel,......
-
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Ward
... ... S.W. 267. Nothing was claimed by the appellees in derogation ... of their deed (Simmons v. Simmons, 150 Ky. 88, 150 ... S.W. 59), and the transaction contained none of the essential ... ...
-
Watlington v. Kasey
... ... Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. Scott, 258 Ky. 51, 79 S.W.2d ... 394, and cases therein cited; Simmons' Adm'r v ... Simmons, 150 Ky. 85, 150 S.W. 59; Galbaugh v ... Rouse, 104 S.W. 959, 31 Ky.Law ... ...